
Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.






Processing your request, Please wait....
August 11, 2009 at 10:03 am
No.. coca cola changed the way it looked, more subtly, yes, but it did change.
August 11, 2009 at 10:39 am
You’re probably thinking of the label & can designs. The actual logo has stayed the same.
August 11, 2009 at 5:38 pm
You, sir, have been proven wrong.. plus, I saw this documentary about coke and pepsi.
I like both coke and pepsi, even though I sense the difference.
August 11, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Excuse me? Did you bray something?
August 11, 2009 at 11:34 am
www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/coca-cola_vs_pepsi_revised_edition.php
Here is the revised list.
August 11, 2009 at 4:32 pm
That article fails (but big ups for finding that, Puulaahi). It’s still clear, even from that link that the Coca-Cola logo or “font” has stayed consistent. The only exception is in 1985 with “New Coke”, but even that still had the old logo on the can near the trademark info. Yes, I’m old.
August 11, 2009 at 6:26 pm
This… Small differences in the model… and the coke thing… but that was only in america.
August 11, 2009 at 11:56 am
*obligatory product loyalty post*
August 11, 2009 at 12:12 pm
www.thecoca-colacompany.com/heritage/pdf/cokelore/Heritage_CokeLore_trademarkchronology.pdf
I still think Coke>Pepsi in flavor. But it’s all sugar water in the end so who cares? People who took this too seriously fail on both ends of the spectrum. Taste is subjective, non-arguable. Always has been.
August 11, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Taste can be influenced, everything is debatable. I mean everything.
August 11, 2009 at 2:41 pm
there was also a can that said COKE on one side.
August 11, 2009 at 4:22 pm
1885 and still just as shit.
PEPSI please.
August 11, 2009 at 5:47 pm
All about Coca Cola from Mexico. They use real sugar, not that syrup crap.
August 11, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Same with the Pepsi in Mexico. Corn Syrup instead of sugar for sweeteners is a pretty standard American thing for some fucked up reason. ( FDA pandering to the corn farmers is the most likely theory, IMO ) Pepsi ( and Mt Dew ) both have a sugar sweetened version out in the US currently, though. Both labeled as “Throwback”, but hard as hell to find depending on where you live.
August 11, 2009 at 8:23 pm
@Puulaahi- NO SHIT. that Mexican COKE is the best ever. i usually bring at least a case home from Mexico- but lately i have found it available at Costco. REAL SUGAR. it’s incredible. CANDY.
most people don’t know this- but the New Coke campaign was a cover-up for Coca-Cola converting from real sugar to fructose corn syrup. they took it away- then gave us a new recipe for regular Coke. the most ingenious advertising campaign ever. fooled us all. mass hysteria. people stock piling old Coke. they made a lot of money off of that.
oh, and Pepsi is for the “Y” generation… WHY do they drink PEPSI?? Pepsi sucks.
August 11, 2009 at 10:45 pm
No, New Coke wasn’t a cover up. That’s a myth. They’d started the changeover years before New Coke even came out. 6 months before New Coke, the sugar was gone completely.
Another oddity is New Coke tracked better in the test marketing than old Coke.
www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp
August 11, 2009 at 10:57 pm
meh. Keep both of em. Give me an IBC rootbeer any day.
August 12, 2009 at 6:40 am
IBC black cherry.
A&E Rootbeer.
Best ever. Moxie