Comments on: Susceptibility to Religion

By: garbledxmission

garbledxmission — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:48:57 +0000

Ok everyone, time to get the sand out of your collective vag ga gas. Arguing over metaphysics over the interwubs….blah, blah, blah.
Entropy is an observable phenomina. That’s all we can prove within a reasonable doubt for the time being.

By: fracked again

fracked again — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:51:23 +0000

Vrik, you are using words that are far too long for maggie.

Poor guy, he doesn’t understand that his attempted smartassery is just a tangle of nerves, shuttling electrons about, wishing that they hadn’t been stuck with that pesky extra chromosome…

By: Blondie

Blondie — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:42:26 +0000

“Yeah, cause there was even a point in there to comprehend?

I made a point out of Blondieâ€™s nothing. My point is people who regurgitate grade 3 level illogical analysis as though theyâ€™re theology authorities on anything are annoying. That annoyed you. 3 guesses as to why.”

What response were you expecting to that other than the one I gave that pulled it apart and showed how you’re a dumbshit?

Fantastic sidewalk definition of emotion btw. I bet your band is awesome. lol

Go back to school so you don’t come off like such a twat.

You have succeeded in making yourself look like a complete fucking idiot over and over.

By: Messatsunokami

Messatsunokami — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:46:47 +0000

The only purpose of life is to die

By: Vrik

Vrik — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:49:44 +0000

I like how you still haven’t responded to my second comment to your first post.
Besides, what is “hope” other than a human emotion? And emotions are nothing but electrochemical process patterns either determined by evolution or our immediate environment.

Other than that, the rest of your original post is just hate-filled gibberish.
“Waaa! Waaaa! Someone is wrong(imo) on the internet! Waaa!”

By: greytone

greytone — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:28:22 +0000

Excellent contribution as always, nyokki.

By: Blondie

Blondie — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:14:05 +0000

img199.imageshack.us/img199/4268/godhatesfags122520021.jpg

By: Blondie

Blondie — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:11:44 +0000

lol

a) illogical analysis? You’re a retard
b) theology authority? Point to where in my post I even skimmed near anything close to that.

The bullshitter who bullshitted to back his fellow bullshitter is full of shit and his bullshit he’s using to try and back his other bullshit is in fact just bullshit and the only person who doesn’t see his bullshit as bullshit is he himself the bullshitter.

By: nyokki

nyokki — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:32:07 +0000

I would say that those that do so do not understand the concept of atheism.

By: greytone

greytone — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:40:03 +0000

Atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods.

In my opinion this does not make a religion.

It is certainly a religious classification. There are indeed groups of atheists who have come together to form organizations. Most commonly just to have a community or for political input.

There is no doctrine, dogma, or agenda that defines atheism. There may be philosophies popular among atheists, such as materialism, naturalism, or humanism. But in and of itself it is simply an answer to a single question. “Do you believe in a god?”

In my opinion this does not make a religion.

If people choose to label it as a religion I’m not sure how much difference it would make. It is what it is.