Comments on: Amazing Spider-Man – Back In Black

By: richgone

richgone — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:03:33 +0000

wait…spider-man is black?

By: tiki god

tiki god — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:32:38 +0000

I looked at the junk, but only because I had no fucking clue what you were talking about. I STILL have no clue.

wtf are you talking about ?

By: aharrigan

aharrigan — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:41:28 +0000

how many people looked at spidermans junk because i mentioned a Swoosh? i was talking about the mark on the chest where one might expect brand placement. for those of you who did, you should find someone you trust, and have a talk with them

By: aharrigan

aharrigan — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:38:16 +0000

Alas, i was not. i was looking at the mark on his chest where the white spider is incomplete. i guess it was more subtle than i thought. why were you checking out his junk?

By: Tyger42

Tyger42 — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:01:49 +0000

Looks vaguely “swoosh” like, but I seriously doubt it was intended to look like the Nike logo.

By: wookie_x

wookie_x — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:33:03 +0000

Why is the first thing you’re looking at is Spidermans COCK????

By: Jaypeezy

Jaypeezy — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:01:09 +0000

Once you go black you never go back

By: ActionBowman

ActionBowman — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:01:12 +0000

ehhhh, maybe. This only puts me off more.

By: rundinj

rundinj — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:59:40 +0000

part of the 3rd leg down on the right side the black suit seems to have a nike sign on it doubt I would have noticed it if it hadent been pointed out, but then again I already own nikes.

By: ActionBowman

ActionBowman — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:59:39 +0000

I’m pretty sure there isn’t a swoosh in there aside from the codpiece. Also, he is less than amazing. Do not want.

By: nyokki

nyokki — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:19:10 +0000

Nike sign?

By: aharrigan

aharrigan — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:05:29 +0000

Is that less than subtle product placement putting a Nike sign there? that was the first thing i noticed. i am suspicious.