Star Trek – Enterprise E Off center
(9 votes, average: 3.44 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites Tags: Space, star trek, Wallpaper
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(9 votes, average: 3.44 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites Tags: Space, star trek, Wallpaper
May 8, 2009 at 1:39 pm
pretty, does it come in wallpepper?
May 8, 2009 at 1:48 pm
This doesn’t look like a Sovereign-class vessel. The secondary hull is wrong. It’s clearly Starfleet, though, and it’s a nice-looking ship.
May 8, 2009 at 2:02 pm
On second thought, maybe it is the Enterprise-E. The angle is a bit funky.
May 8, 2009 at 2:32 pm
I used to imagine every series possible as being a cross over with Transformers.
Starships from Star Trek were some bad ass motherfuckers in these day dreams.
May 8, 2009 at 2:36 pm
@RSIxidor:
Voyager had those totally pointless/awesome moving nascelles
May 8, 2009 at 2:49 pm
@tiki god: +
I of course do not recall this. The only series I watched a lot of was Deep Space Nine, and I loved it. Especially the Ferengis.
May 8, 2009 at 2:50 pm
YOU STUPID FUCKING PLUS SIGN! YOU’VE SHOWN UP AGAIN HAVE YOU I WILL KILL YOU MEET YOUR NEMESIS: -
May 8, 2009 at 3:57 pm
@RSIxidor: Same here, I watched it as a kid, but as grew I saw it was silly.
May 8, 2009 at 4:25 pm
Certainly not the Enterprise E. The nacelles are in the wrong position (below the primary hull) and the wrong shape. The Sovereign class nacelle has a trapazoidal cross-section with a ridge running down the length of the top of the nacelle. This clearly does not. Also, as noted above, the secondary hull looks wrong.
May 8, 2009 at 8:38 pm
The new Star Trek Movie kicked uber ass. FYI
May 8, 2009 at 9:19 pm
@lumps937: dork
May 8, 2009 at 9:39 pm
Well, according to this: www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/galexploration_sovereign.jpg
it almost looks like it. The nacelles are rounder as lumps937 says. (937, is that your area code, in Dayton? The UFO code? [look at the phone and see what that spells...])
And it’s a weird angle, so the secondary hull could look like that.
Yes, I’m a Trek geek. And no, I did not go out and watch the movie yesterday or today, that will be tomorrow, unless my wife decides to go see the son in Savannah and his girlfriend, and then it will be Monday. I’m not dragging my wife through the thunderous crowds, she doesn’t like it.
May 8, 2009 at 10:27 pm
@tiki god: The sad thing is that I know why it had the movable nacelles. They were designed in response to scientific data showing that warp drive was damaging to subspace, as shown in TNG episode “Force of Nature”
May 11, 2009 at 12:29 am
@MikeBabaguh:
Ship is not only off center, it’s upside down.
May 11, 2009 at 1:51 am
That is an Excalibur-class starship, which I believe is a fan-created ship…it’s bounced around the internet for a couple of years, I’ve seen it used as a battleship in third party modifications to Star Trek RTS games. A flatter and larger variant on the Sovereign-class.