www.stuckincustoms.com/2007/02/02/nuclear-winter-in-chernobyl/
Chernobyl in 2007
(5 votes, average: 4.60 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites Tags: Sad :(, Science!, wtf
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(5 votes, average: 4.60 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites Tags: Sad :(, Science!, wtf
April 18, 2009 at 2:10 pm
It keeps amazing me how accurate STALKER was in its portrayal of the buildings etc. With the exception of the electricity flowing into the sky, of course, but I think artistic license covers that.
April 18, 2009 at 2:28 pm
This place is a Blast!
April 18, 2009 at 2:29 pm
4th Picture is astounding.
April 18, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Dammit just make a movie set in Chernobyl already. I bet the shots would be amazing.
April 18, 2009 at 2:42 pm
I love how the HDR technique gives photos that unreal feeling. It’s pretty cool.
April 18, 2009 at 2:58 pm
@Billy Manic: Still can’t. Does rates are still too high for long term occupancy in most of the area around it. Life is slowly returning as nature takes over the sight.
April 18, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Dose rates. spelling failure
April 18, 2009 at 3:33 pm
@Drunkin:
Not “sight,” you’re thinking of “site.” DOUBLE FAIL. It’s alright. Happens to the best of us.
April 18, 2009 at 4:18 pm
@Sticky: yeah, I suck…
April 18, 2009 at 4:31 pm
@Sticky: Exactly. Because it’s “all right” not “alright” which is never right. (Or else irregardless is a word too.)
April 18, 2009 at 4:33 pm
i normally like HDR photos, but I’m not too keen on seeing them of this place. I’d go for regular photos of Chernobyl instead of shop’d ones any day.
April 18, 2009 at 5:11 pm
I remember hiding behind that ferris wheel slaughtering wave after wave of oncoming troops.
April 18, 2009 at 5:16 pm
@rattybad: I find these hilariously misconstrued. Here, Webster will clear it up for you.
(tl;dr – people use it, it’s a word)
USAGE Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.†There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance.
April 18, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Man, FUCK that ferris wheel
April 18, 2009 at 6:47 pm
I think I can see Capt. MacMillan there somewh-
*HEADSHOT*
April 18, 2009 at 7:23 pm
Is that a Hand of Nod I see?
April 18, 2009 at 7:25 pm
oh, beautiful pics, btw
April 18, 2009 at 8:11 pm
@Paul_Is_Drunk: Webster’s is an amateur’s dictionary. OED or GTFO.
April 18, 2009 at 8:34 pm
I was actually there a few months ago. Should I post my pictures?
April 18, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Robzy, yes, please. I am fascinated by this place.
April 18, 2009 at 10:54 pm
A Ferris wheel?
April 18, 2009 at 11:28 pm
@robzy: please also post any pics of body mutation due to the radiation please.
April 18, 2009 at 11:29 pm
@rattybad: Irregardless, the word are in common usage and are understood by people who see or hear them, alright?
April 19, 2009 at 8:01 am
@cm3ars: You’ll be waiting a while. Life is not like the movies. Nuclear power is actually clean and safe and Chernobyl was a preventable (human error) accident, not some failure of the nuclear industry.
April 19, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Reminds me of Call of Duty 4 for some reason.
April 20, 2009 at 2:53 am
Someone mentioned that deformations are not accuring, this is a picture I found on another site.
media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/L_o_L/chernobyl1_gif.jpg
April 20, 2009 at 9:18 am
@mosher111:
That’s a picture from 1996, ten years after the incident. More than 10 years have passed.