Audrey Hepburn

Added on April 9th, 2009 by AgZed | Report Post
Tags:Sexy

Smoking hot and classy as fuck.
You can keep your silicone Barbie dolls, I\’m with 1960s Audrey all the way.

20 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Stonestead (#10102)

15 years ago

What if the long gloves came back into fashion? Could it even possibly work today?

gor (#2620)

15 years ago

Here, here!!

I’ll take a natural B-cup over plastic inserts any day.

Sticky (#463)

15 years ago

@...gor:
Agreed.

PmWi (#3767)

15 years ago

@...gor: @...Sticky: I’ll third that statement

dieAntagonista (#)

15 years ago

Ah all you people including AgZed, make me feel good.

multi_masked (#2246)

15 years ago

As a gay man, I am obligated to say that I love the shit out of her!

nyoki (#3444)

15 years ago

Gawd I love her.

@...co-mountainman @...usa.net: I have dozens of pairs of gloves and 3 are full length (grey, white, black). My hands setimes become so sensitive that I have to protect them. I’ve made an accessory out of necessity (same w/ glasses).

nyoki (#3444)

15 years ago

*sometimes

Awesome1 (#3992)

15 years ago

hoo-ray

HeelsUpDickIn (#7209)

15 years ago

audrey hepburn is the most beutiful person in history and no other woman will veer be as beautful, BUT, she wasn’t really that ‘hot’

dogsurfer (#2233)

15 years ago

I’m more delighted by the 60’s version of expressive beauty of Natalie Wood, Annette Funicello, and Barbara Eden (“Oh Master”).

chupathingy (#1833)

15 years ago

It is such a turn on when a girl is classy in public situations and she is the ultimate woman for that reason.

AgZed (#2298)

Author

15 years ago

@...dieAntagonista: This is what I do.

@...multi_masked: Straight men are obligated to say the same. OBLIGATED, motherfuckers!

@...HeelsUpDickIn: ‘Hot’ nowadays has connotations of trashiness, so you’re right on that because dearly departed Audrey has far too much class to fit into the category of ‘hot’. But goddamn is she sexy. I mean, God. Damn. I’ve seen more than a few women who are more physically attractive, but none come anywhere even close to having her sex appeal. I guess class & sophistication are a bit harder to pull off than prancing around in your panties and calling that sexy.

Note to future generations: Sexy is not the same thing as fuckable. Megan Fox is fuckable. Audrey Hepburn is sexy. Learn the fucking difference.

aarpie (#4072)

15 years ago

Damn right, AgZed! Real women FTW!

BourbonDingo (#5707)

15 years ago

She looks better with short hair, but she is still beautiful.

sykotik (#658)

15 years ago

Ah yes, now that’s beauty. Class, intelligence, looks, what else can you ask for?

AgZed, you da man, (…. woman?)Either way you rock!

AgZed (#2298)

Author

15 years ago

@...sykotik: I am man, hear me rawr.

RPTM6 (#1840)

15 years ago

she is simply stunning. AgZed, you are a man of great taste. the world lacks that kind of class nowadays

Zane (#343)

15 years ago

@...PmWi: 100% agree with this statement.

brokenpistons (#8309)

15 years ago

She just has that old way of walking and talking that is so sexy. And her body is a work of art, she’s slender and well-formed with a beautiful face. She’s not fuckable, she’s the kind of woman that would seduce you if she wanted you, and if not you’d still be honored to be in her presence or just to know her. I agree with the first statement as well. Audrey Hepburn ::::::> Barbie