B61-11 Nuclear Bunker Buster Bomb
(5 votes, average: 3.80 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites Tags: Military, Technology
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(5 votes, average: 3.80 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites Tags: Military, Technology
April 7, 2009 at 11:04 pm
So, basically this is an underground Nuke?
April 7, 2009 at 11:05 pm
Means even if you are 1000ft underground, you are 100% royally fucked.
April 7, 2009 at 11:06 pm
More technology = More problems.
April 7, 2009 at 11:28 pm
Not if that problem is irradicating an uncontrolled North Korea. (Not saying we need nukes to handle N. Korea)
April 7, 2009 at 11:31 pm
I like the “dial-a-yield” feature. One guy gets just a biiiiiiit overzealous means extra fun.
April 7, 2009 at 11:40 pm
just what we need. More radioactive diarrhea on this fucked up planet. FUCK YOU military industrial complex FUCK YOu
April 8, 2009 at 12:11 am
Orbital Tungsten kinetic weapons will make these and nukes obsolete.
April 8, 2009 at 12:14 am
So we were developing this after we signed the NPT?
April 8, 2009 at 12:32 am
Yes, because it technically doesn’t qualify as a nuclear weapon. (yes I know, I know, let it go.) Secondly, at the time they really only paid lip service to the NPT.
April 8, 2009 at 12:34 am
I’m glad we spent billions on this.
Maybe we can use it on the caves in Afghanistan.
April 8, 2009 at 12:40 am
Feel happy, they spent more on the Kinetic Weapons Program. But don’t worry, Obama is gonna change that whole military industrial complex system and fix it up right good I tell ya whut.
April 8, 2009 at 12:57 am
I really want a pen that looks exactly like that.
April 8, 2009 at 1:03 am
with or without the fallout?
April 8, 2009 at 1:33 am
The pen is mightier than the thermal nuclear device.
April 8, 2009 at 1:41 am
That’s “newkewlurrr” to you dammit!
April 8, 2009 at 1:56 am
@garbledxmission: But I like the ring of: Global Thermal Nuclear War.
April 8, 2009 at 2:16 am
@sylvanish: HOLY SHIT YOU ARE BACK
April 8, 2009 at 2:25 am
@thelotuseater725: shhh, don’t tell no one
April 8, 2009 at 5:39 am
nuke ‘em till they glow, then shoot them in the dark. Obama will not rid the world of nukes cause we’re too smart to get rid of them. we’ll just say we did, and first time anyone tries using one. . .
special delivery from Oak Ridge
April 8, 2009 at 8:54 am
@Puulaahi:
What if the plastic of the pen is vaporized and the metal is turned into slag?
@frightfulfish:
Oakridge? OOM PAPA OOM PAPA OOM PAPA MOW MOW
April 8, 2009 at 10:33 am
bye bye arabs
April 8, 2009 at 11:07 am
@garbledxmission: Those I’d like to see a chart on…and yet, wouldn’t they also violate a no-weapons-in-space treaty, or does that only cover nukes as well?
brb, Google
April 8, 2009 at 11:25 am
There really isn’t much point in these… conventional bombs have gotten to the point where they can do pretty much anything these can, using smart fuzes (void sensing and the like) laser-guiding, GPS, etc, and there’s no fallout (nuclear or political) to worry about.
April 8, 2009 at 4:12 pm
yea, but nukes be awesome.
April 8, 2009 at 11:15 pm
@Sticky: (ORNL) Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee. original site of Plutonium production for our bombs.
A-well-a don’t you know about the bird?
April 8, 2009 at 11:17 pm
@njch412: Yet with all that amazing nuclear technology we have, we can’t do jack shit to North Korea unless we’re prepared to accept that 90% of South Korea and who knows what percent of Japan will face a conventional missile wrath that will destroy their civilian and military populations and lead to an international climate where America will never again have any international trust.
Yep, good old 1950s thinking, “we have nukes, so everyone else is behind the 8-ball.”
@deuce: Yeah, but nukes or not-nukes, bunker busting is a dead-end game. Trying to use explosives to get past hundreds of feat of dirt and then into hardened concrete (if you have perfect intelligence knowing where to bomb), is a losing proposition.
April 9, 2009 at 2:35 am
@frightfulfish: It’s the word.
April 9, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Who needs bunker nukes when you could flash it with the SOL platforms from Akira or the Zeus Cannon from FF:SW. Good pure, clean, photons. Reagan’s space based weapons FTW!
April 11, 2009 at 1:54 am
@fullofstars
so, is your head firmly wedged up your own delusional fantasy ass, or only on days ending in 9?.
April 17, 2009 at 8:17 pm
@garbledxmission: I dunno, what’s today’s date…. Ending in 9? More like odd/even days in “Y”. Why you ask?
March 14, 2010 at 7:09 am
Jesus Christ this is a fucked up world.