Issue #25 cover, January 1995.
Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.





(5 votes, average: 3.40 out of 5)


Processing your request, Please wait....
March 5, 2009 at 3:06 pm
Niiiice belt buckle.
March 5, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Have Spiderman 2099… wonder if its worth anything.
March 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm
i would think spikes that large on the belt would be cumbersome.
March 5, 2009 at 3:32 pm
I have all the 2099 series for all characters, all issues…glad it didn’t last long, it was meh at best, but Marvel has done worse…
March 5, 2009 at 4:48 pm
@token2k6:
I liked Spider-Man, never read any of the others.
March 5, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Are you SURE marvel has done worse? I mean, really? Because I can’t remember much worse than the 2099
March 5, 2009 at 7:26 pm
I collected many of the 2099 series for a while, but quit as it quickly became unreadable.
March 5, 2009 at 7:53 pm
@aarpie: I guess in the back of my mind I was thinking about Amalgam…that definitely had more of the marvel side to DC than anything…and it wasn’t that great.
March 5, 2009 at 8:22 pm
Looks like the love child of Spawn, and Iron Man. I never read them, but the 2099 comics seemed like Marvel trying to make some of their characters more hardcore and edgy. It was the 90s after all.
March 5, 2009 at 9:28 pm
@aarpie:
did you miss the entire “new universe” thing?
or maybe the “Punisher Meets Archie” books?
March 5, 2009 at 10:18 pm
@tiki god:
48 pages no ads? Sounds good to me.
March 6, 2009 at 10:25 pm
Personally, I think he’s overcompensating for something…