Evolution?
(5 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...
Click to Add to favorites | Tags: Humor, Politics, WTF Leave a comment ?
28 Responses to Evolution?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
February 8, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Your saying Bush evolved into a Socialist?
February 8, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Well yeah, it was Bush that nationalized the banks, so yeah, he turned into a socialist (evolved if you like, except he doesn’t believe in evolution).
February 8, 2009 at 2:10 pm
@greenie: A 6 percent increase is HARDLY socialism, what are you basing this off of?
February 8, 2009 at 2:13 pm
that’s a funny observation.. i always saw Obama as a black bush! but hopefully it wont end up that way!!
February 8, 2009 at 2:16 pm
From thatsrightnate.com/2008/07/12/obama-tax-increase-will-hurt-america/
The current Barack Obama plan to roll back the Bush tax cuts and increase taxes on people making over $250,000 per year could be devestating in this current economy. With recent reports that both Ed McMann and former NBA star Vin Baker are in danger of getting their homes foreclosed on, do we really need to be raising taxes on ther wealthy at this time?
With the rising price of oil disproportionately hitting private jet and luxury car owners, a new round of tax cuts may send many of the wealthy into merely being upper class and could reduce many members of the upper class to merely upper-middle class status. The food crisis has also disproportionately effected the wealthy with the price of kobe beef more than doubling in the last 18 months.
In a capitalistic society, the wealthy not only give us something to aspire to, but drive many of our industries. Miniature poodles, high end jewelry, yachts, mansions, and over sized dining room tables will all see large sales drops in the event of a tax increase on the wealthy.
Furthermore, according to the Brookings Institute, nearly 2% of small businesses would also be affected by this plan (www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?Docid=1534&DocTypeID=7) . Fortunately, there are people willing to fight Obama on this. Steve Forbes has joined McCain in opposing Obama’s tax on the wealthy, but we need more rich people to come forward before its too late.
February 8, 2009 at 2:31 pm
@Dublin0:
I see what you’re saying, but I also don’t care if they can’t have an oversize dining table. At least they have things they can sell to help out, and if they were smart, they wouldn’t have bought so much stupid meaningless shit anyway. I know this is cliche, but were I to find riches, I would not be so idiotically irresponsible with my income to worry about oversize dining tables.
That said, the reason I came to this thread:
That’s backward, the monkey is supposed to be at the beginning /KomissarVC
February 8, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Regression! Please revert.
February 8, 2009 at 2:35 pm
@RSIxidor: That’s backward, the monkey is supposed to be at the beginning /KosmissarVC
Dear god dude, I was wondering when someone was going to say something like that:)
February 8, 2009 at 2:37 pm
@Dublin0: “Rising price of oil”? Wake up and welcome to 6 months ago. Oil ain’t rising anymore. In fact, it’s been pretty steady around $40 a barrel for a month straight now. ( Funnily, gas prices are creeping up in spite of this ) That’s $100 down from its peak during the summer.
Anyway, the assertation that lowering taxes on those with less money and raising taxes on those with more could be “devastating” is just plain stupid. The upper class pay proportionally far LESS taxes than the lower classes.
February 8, 2009 at 2:50 pm
@Dublin0:
The rich give us something to aspire to? Grow the fuck up. Life isn’t about diamond jewelry and limousines. I aspire to live like Donald Trump about as much as I aspire to grow cancerous tumors on my asshole. I don’t give a good god damn if Ed McMahon has to sell his house; let him eat Ramen. The rich don’t give a flying fuck about the poor and they are easily replaced by the next generation of innovators and nouveau riche.
February 8, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Anyone here heard of sarcasm, great arguments none the less (also sarcasm)
February 8, 2009 at 3:00 pm
@Dublin0:
Was not familiar with that site, nor did I click the link, but goddamn you got me.
February 8, 2009 at 3:02 pm
@greenie:
I was emulating KomissarVC’s bitch ass, not agreeing with him.
February 8, 2009 at 3:05 pm
@RSIxidor: Wish I could take credit I found it sometime ago and it wasn’t until I read it all the way did I realize it was the always dreaded coded & clandestine wit
February 8, 2009 at 3:46 pm
@RSIxidor:
No shit.
February 8, 2009 at 5:34 pm
its a swap over to total opposites
From a human with monkey intelligence to a monkey with human intelligence
February 8, 2009 at 5:48 pm
leave me alone?
February 8, 2009 at 6:46 pm
the title of this post should say Change instead of evolution
February 8, 2009 at 6:48 pm
@rattybad: @Tyger42: @RSIxidor:
get out of my gene pool. it’s adult swim time.
February 8, 2009 at 6:53 pm
From stupid to lair.
With is bettter?
February 8, 2009 at 8:29 pm
@nobody knows:
But the stupid guy lied and was stupid. Plus his trump card: Cheney.
@KommissarKvC:
I already took care of this thread, just go suckle your mothers tit.
February 8, 2009 at 8:54 pm
@RSIxidor: Oh oh oh…. RACISM DUAL!!!
February 8, 2009 at 9:00 pm
FIGHT!? lolol
February 8, 2009 at 10:17 pm
This is what Creationists actually believe.
Also FAIL.
February 9, 2009 at 3:16 am
Well the problem with taxing the rich is that the rich are assholes. Instead of selling their expensive summer homes and five other ferraris they will more likely cut out 500-5,000 workers from whatever mega-omni-conglomo corp they Run/own/extort. Obamas tax plan is a good idea in theory but in the real world it will not happen that way. a large portion of the rich would rather fire people they don’t know personally or ever have to see than give up their Welsh Farms deliveries and Evian water coolers. Trust me i grew up in one of the richest counties in the nation. The mega Wealthy can be absolute monsters to those below them.
February 9, 2009 at 7:58 am
@thelotuseater725: but say this. the amount of people in that “company” is required to make sure the company get’s profit. and if they fire 500-5000 workers they wouldn’t make as much profit, you need a certain amount to complete the job if you reduce it the job will not be completed. but your statement is still correct
February 10, 2009 at 6:30 pm
For even more lulz, flip the picture horizontally.
February 11, 2009 at 10:54 am
No matter how witty or funny a comment was intended it always sucks when it’d the same shit already said, read before you post