Your Ad Here

Windows XP Pro

,
12 votes, average: 2.67 out of 512 votes, average: 2.67 out of 512 votes, average: 2.67 out of 512 votes, average: 2.67 out of 512 votes, average: 2.67 out of 5 (12 votes, average: 2.67 out of 5) (Log in to vote!)
Loading ... Loading ...

windows xp pro 500x400 Windows XP Pro

Processing your request, Please wait....
  • submit to reddit
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
This entry was posted in Images and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
lolkittens!

Ology

16 Responses to Windows XP Pro

  1. Well, it’s certainly…random.

  2. And… because it’s for PROS

  3. It is for the BEST PROS.

  4. @LukeV1-5:
    It is for the BREAST POSE…wait, what?

  5. Because it still beats the pants off Vista?

    Vista can go suck leporous donkey balls

  6. Sorry, Win2k is still the best.

  7. @aarpie: Yes that is the correct answer

    aarpie is the winner of game

  8. Next up, Windows 7 Professional

  9. @reboot: Yeah, I agree… If developers were still writing games without XP apis, I’d still be runng W2k…

    @ColombianMonkey:
    I dunno about that. If memory serves, Vista’s internal rev number is actually only 3 or 4 revs above XP, and carries around a vast majority of it’s bloat. There were some minor internal speed, security and architecture optimizations performed, but beyond that, I think precious little was done to the kernel. It was primarily all additional bells and whistles.

    I think Windows 7 will have more in common with W2K than Vista…

  10. Windows 7 is just a big ass service pack instead they make money for this. vista technology comes from w2k as also like w7

  11. @ColombianMonkey: LOL From W2k on, they have all been big fat service packs… Nothing new there… Look at the OS version the kernel reports, they don’t lie. You can see how many steps they take with each new version, and they aren’t changing a heck of a lot…

    They could technically have just stuck with W2K, and made improvements, but there’s no money in that… :/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>