Mikoyangurevich15bis

Posted on January 3, 2009 by mikoyangurevich15
Filed Under Images and has been tagged:
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...


Mig15From1oClock_1.jpg (44 KB)


 Related Posts
  • No related posts

    • Share This Post:

    Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge. All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.

    Comments are automatically closed after 30 days.

    9 Responses to “Mikoyangurevich15bis”

    1. nobody knows
      on January 3rd, 2009 at 12:11 pm

      F-88 saber is better.

    2. KommissarKvC
      on January 3rd, 2009 at 12:22 pm

      Russia FTW

    3. mikoyangurevich15
      on January 3rd, 2009 at 2:48 pm

      This photo,of all things,is the icon I use on most of my email account,etc.Ha!

    4. MrPsychic
      on January 3rd, 2009 at 5:42 pm

      @nobody knows: You mean F-86?

    5. mikoyangurevich15
      on January 3rd, 2009 at 6:21 pm

      F-88.I did`nt notice that.There was precursor to the F-101 Voodoo (prototypes only)called “F-88″.MiG15 had two 23mm and one 37mm cannon.A lot of fire power compared with the F-86.It just had six 50 caliber machine guns.All later USAF aircraft had cannons.It also was smaller and lighter,thus had a higher climb rate and a marginally tighter turning radius.Speed was about the same.What made American pilots prevail in the Korean War was training.Which was far better than the Soviets,North Koreans or Chinese.

    6. thelotuseater725
      on January 3rd, 2009 at 11:46 pm

      @mikoyangurevich15:
      I see what you did there

    7. MarauderDeuce
      on January 4th, 2009 at 4:06 am

      And no one has thought to mention that it’s NATO call sign is the Fagot. :)

      I’m certain that the reference is to fire wood but it’s interesting that the Mig-15 is the only one of these aircraft that you don’t hear referred to by it’s call sign.

    8. mikoyangurevich15
      on January 4th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

      @MarauderDeuce ,UN Forces,then NATO.Yea,they were a bit miffed when they ran across this thing in Korea.The USAF initially had nothing to counter it with but F-80`s and “Twin Mustang” F-82`s.Nowadays they`d probably call it a “Newfag”.

    9. MarauderDeuce
      on January 5th, 2009 at 4:25 am

      Nah, I’m fairly certain that Fagot here refers to a bundle of wood. Yet another term which doesn’t get much use as it’s now rude.

    Newer Comments »

    Site Sponsors:

    Advertise Here!


    interactive fiction

    MCS On Digg!
    MCS On Reddit!
    Star Trek Book Club
    Tiki Tumble