Comments on: Joker Kills Batman – In front of disabled kids

By: Phyreblade

Phyreblade — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:04:17 +0000

@dtepes: Perhaps not neccesarily sodomy but a rather epic "GET IN MAH BELLEH" moment...

By: dtepes

dtepes — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:55:58 +0000

No no no. Unstoppable force versus immovable object? That’s Juggernaut vs the Blob. What happens then? Immovable object does not move. Unstoppable force is unstopped, but is diverted.

Or we see the most frightening example of inadvertent sodomy ever.

By: Phyreblade

Phyreblade — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:09:41 +0000

LOL I was about to cry “‘POAST”, but for some reason I find it absolutely hilarious that the original ‘poast is in the list of related post, and couldn’t stop laughing enough to actually type repost…

wait.. whut?

By: warren

warren — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:15:04 +0000

Oh golly, the infamy.

Joker’s #1 goal was to kill Batman in front of a bunch of hydrocephalic cripples? Sheesh.

Frank Miller’s going to go and die now just so he can turn over in his grave.

By: mAgnUS BUTTfoorson

mAgnUS BUTTfoorson — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:31:57 +0000

@Healey: that's called an interpretation, kiddo.

By: Healey

Healey — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:57:14 +0000

I think we all know the Joker wouldn’t kill batman. They’re destined to constantly fight but never win. As The Joker in “The Dark Knight” says, “This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object”.

By: natedog

natedog — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:34:54 +0000

1st