@...Marrock: so. . . wait. I have to bullet this to keep it straight.
In this thread:
*You correct someone on a typo in a comment thread by-
*making a flawed reference to an easily verified subject-
*changed mid-comment from an overcomplicated typo-heckling to a comment about Caio’s “sinning,” implying a judgment on your part about his character in general-
*then, when the object of your derision corrects your error with facts, you scoff at the idea of fact-checking- regardless of the fact the you started by commenting on an editing error before-
*slipping into foul language for no reason, only to be followed by-
*a denouncement of internet criticism’s relevance, though it was exactly what you had joined the thread to do. . .

so. . . what’s up with that, man? I mean- it seems like you started out trying to score some points and ended up getting mocked. My imaginary evaluation of self-worth aside, what happened here can’t be what you intended to happen. . .so, fail?
I think fail, man.
Oh, and Protip: you don’t waste time arguing with people that don’t matter- but don’t worry, maturity is on its way, kiddo.