It’s official now… your full of fail.. now go away.
Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.










Processing your request, Please wait....
November 6, 2008 at 4:07 pm
“your full of fail” = fail
November 6, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Yeah i know.. it was late I was drunk when i made them…
November 6, 2008 at 4:45 pm
You fail for bashing a great man.
L2 Flame Palin noob.
November 6, 2008 at 5:32 pm
That’s a matter of opinion Thrella. McCain’s policies do not represent what I envision this nation to be.
November 6, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Please cite said policies and objections or gfto half wit teenage non voter.
This post is the real fucking FAIL.
November 6, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Elepski, you are FAIL for mocking a man who fought for our country, whether you agreed with his campaign or not.
November 6, 2008 at 7:14 pm
It’s kinda irritating to me that some eighth grade Krylon-huffer would think this is funny.
/voted Obama
November 6, 2008 at 7:30 pm
@Luna: That’s not really accurate. It’s pretty annoying how people put veterans up on a pedestal. I’m not saying anything against McCain here, because when he’s being himself and not the monster his advisors turned him into he’s a pretty respectable guy, but to say that mocking a person who fought for our country is FAIL just isn’t true. Serving in our military right now are murderers, thieves, rapists, active gang members, wife beaters and so on. Just because they’re serving in the military doesn’t make them superhuman. It just means that for whatever reason they have found themselves in the military.
The fact of the matter is McCain did FAIL to win the election.
November 6, 2008 at 8:03 pm
The problem is… you all ASSUMED I was attacking his character….
These where a commentary on the effectiveness of his Campaign.. Maybe I should have included Palin too.. or used the campaign logo.. but oh well.
So stop getting defensive and stop reading falsehoods into it and take it for what it is.
As far as the list of polices i do not agree with:
-Iraq
-Iran
-North Korea
-Offshore Drilling
-His support of the corporate tax cuts
-His tax plan all together
So what is FAIL is turning this into me attacking a veteran on his service.
yes he is honorable for his actions… do these alone make him qualified to lead… not in my opinion.
And thank you Special Kail for being intelligent.
November 6, 2008 at 8:15 pm
@Luna: Hugo Chavez, Augusto Pinochet, Mao and Hitler all fought for their countries, as members of their armed forces, before they took over the joint and went all wacky. By your logic, we shouldn’t say bad things about them either.
Disclaimer: I am by no means suggesting that McCain is as bad as any of the above mentioned people, or that he had any intention of establishing an authoritarian/totalitarian dictatorship in America, or even that he’s at all bad as a person/politician/etc. , I’m merely pointing out the idiocy of exempting people from criticsm/mockery/satire based soley on the fact that they fought in the military.
November 6, 2008 at 8:20 pm
@AgZed: … It’s a sad state of affairs when a disclaimer is twice as long as a comment.
Disclaimer: The above is not a sleight directed at MCS viewers, Americans, or the rest of the world at large, but rather a commentary on the seemingly growing number of people who seem to have no clue about how to debate an issue and fail to realise that simply because a logical fallacy sounds good, doesn’t mean that it’s true.
November 6, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Luna = pwn3d
WIN!
November 6, 2008 at 9:01 pm
@AgZed: “realize”
fix’d.
Disclaimer: Any and all grammatical errors reported in this thread are strictly intended for the person who created the error to apprehend and embrace his/her own douchebaggery ironically when attempting to sound intelligent in his/her own disclaimer.
November 6, 2008 at 9:19 pm
@pedantic: Unless, of course, he or she is British. In that case it would be an accepted spelling and you would be the douchebagger.
November 6, 2008 at 9:55 pm
@Special Kail: Unless you realise the irony of accusing someone with his particular screen name of being pedantic.
@AgZed: It is a sad day when people feel disclaimers on here are necessary. I refuse to let PC invade the haven of irrationality and childish amusement that is MCS. So, in the spirit of that resistance to uptight, small minds:
@Luna go suck a rancid donkey cock, pull the cactus out of your ass and shake the sand out of your vagina and get a fucking SENSE OF HUMOR.
@Magnus: He cited, are you satisfied? Also, who cares, it’s a free country…sort of…kind of…still. Either way it’s his right. You don’t have to like it but he doesn’t really have to justify himself OR leave so grow up yourself you know that. You spew racist shit on this site all the time and YOU’RE still here.
Personally, I respect his service and his time as a POW, but if you look hard into his service record it’s really not all that impressive. Had his father and grandfather not been who they were, the John McCain story would have had a much different ending.
All of you defending him should stop screaming about specific details of a man’s history and take the entirety into account before deifying him. That goes for Obama, too. No one is perfectly clean, especially in high level politics.
November 6, 2008 at 10:02 pm
@Special Kail: Not British per se, but educated there, so same difference. It’s always fun when people trap themselves into these things. Also, someone who calls themselves ‘pedantic’ should really have a better grasp of the difference between posts and threads.
November 7, 2008 at 12:57 am
Man these threads have been creating deafening amounts of stupid.
November 7, 2008 at 1:18 am
Lotus, you know what they say about stupid…goes back to the baseline we were discussing in the forums…
@AgZed. No, they wouldn’t. That’s the plodding, oblivious borgesque glory of the pedantic mindset.
November 7, 2008 at 4:33 am
@Special Kail: I stand corrected. Kind of. I guess.
November 9, 2008 at 9:14 am
@ all the fuckers who consider themselves “experts” at political science from watching the news:
YOU FAIL.