Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.





(29 votes, average: 3.90 out of 5)


Processing your request, Please wait....
September 11, 2008 at 4:49 am
ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH
September 11, 2008 at 6:33 am
ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH
September 11, 2008 at 9:33 am
the nerd part of me can’t help but agree with the presentation.
September 11, 2008 at 10:29 am
D :
September 11, 2008 at 5:47 pm
uhh… how are we determining these heights? Because if its an average height throughout the year, then the 2001 should be about 1/4th shorter…
September 11, 2008 at 8:24 pm
@Mystik
Actually I believe they probably used an instantaneous sampling method…
September 11, 2008 at 9:12 pm
0 ft? But weren’t there 7 seven buildings, and a couple that still stand?
September 12, 2008 at 3:56 am
@Phyreblade
If they used an instantaneous sampling method then they should provide a date/time rather than leave the ambiguity of the span of an entire year… Sorry, the nerd part of me isn’t agreeing with this presentation.
And yes, Billy Manic is correct. And if you’re just talking about the towers themselves, I’m sure that some of the rubble that took a while to clean up added up to more than 0 ft, especially when there were support beams standing that were over 10 ft tall.
September 14, 2008 at 3:30 am
@Mystik
Indeed, I can understand your frustration… But listening to your inner nerd will cause you great suffering here… in teh intarwebs zoen… LOL