Amendment to The Constitution

image001ccc.jpg (85 KB)

“I keep thinking we should include something in the Constitution in case the people elect a fucking moron.”


Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    14 Comment threads
    0 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    10 Comment authors
    bobKorinthianCaiodeuceTGGeko Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Korinthian
    Member

    I wish.

    Elepski
    Member

    Soo True…

    Marrock
    Member

    Wouldn’t that be the second amendment?

    natedog
    Member

    awesome!

    i think there should be an IQ test in order to vote.

    or at least use the ACT or some shit.

    jasonp
    Member

    IQ to vote? How about an IQ test to be president…

    Caio
    Member

    Let’s spin the election results to favour my demographic: It’s democracy. You know, as long as it’s my demographic otherwise it’s tyranny.

    Marrock
    Member

    So you want to argue the fact that president monkey is a dribbling moron?

    costanza
    Member
    costanza

    We get what we deserve, especially if we wind up in an obamanation.

    TGGeko
    Member

    Its called impeachment

    deuce
    Member

    It’s called Parliament… if the chief executive is an idiot, then you can give him the boot. Significantly more efficient and far less painful than our system, in which the only way to remove a President from office is to put the country and the rule of law before your party, which simply doesn’t happen here.

    Caio
    Member

    1) The party/government whip (or equivalent) keeps the party line in a parliamentary system, so don’t think a vote of non-confidence doesn’t require legislators to defy the party. 2) Vote of non-confidence only works when the ruling party holds less than half the seats in the more powerful house of the legislature. In theory the party in a “confident” parliament could rise up against its leader but that has never happened. It’s a trade-off really. I think the Presidential system can be just as good as the Parliamentary. The real problem comes from using the archaic ‘first-past-the-post’ election system. First… Read more »

    Caio
    Member

    Erm, just as a note, what I described in 2) has happened on a small, insignificant scale, but it’s pretty unlikely to happen on a large scale in general. And again, the vote of non-confidence is nearly worthless in a two-party system (meaning the two parties hold at least 90 of parliament; how many parties form governments is another matter), unless the election is really close, which most of the time it isn’t.

    Korinthian
    Member

    You USAders couldn’t impeach anyone, much less overthrow the government because a bunch of morons are in power.

    bob
    Member

    I thought Obama was an unqualified flip-flopper, not a moron? I could live with a moron in office.



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas