I took these while I was in Thailand. One would hope that one would check the spelling when making knock offs. The shirts are just funny.
Amusing clothing
(8 votes, average: 3.88 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites 
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
July 28, 2008 at 8:04 pm
Why is the shit on fire? Or is that soft serve?
July 28, 2008 at 8:31 pm
Why is the soft serve on fire?
July 28, 2008 at 9:28 pm
I suspect those are just poorly drawn stink symbols rising up from a load, so the translation might be: “pitcher of beer + stinky shit + doggie style sex + lying in bed like a corpse…EVERY DAY!” Makes perfect sense to me…those wild and crazy Thais!
July 28, 2008 at 11:19 pm
My god, outoffocus, you are a douche.
July 28, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Quick, submit that second one to Engrish.com!
July 28, 2008 at 11:56 pm
What’s wrong Caio? Did Akircher disagree with you on another post and now he’s on your “soft serve” list?
July 29, 2008 at 1:17 am
@Caio – While clean vaginas are nice… I’m not sure why I’ve suddenly been labeled an instrument for gaining such aka Whyyyy am I a douche?? *sulks*
July 29, 2008 at 1:35 am
i like the Kellogg’s knock off in the background of the second pic. beautiful!
July 29, 2008 at 1:41 am
Well, to answer those last two questions, Outoffocus travelled (presumably) huge distances and spend lots of money to photograph novelty t-shirts in English and a religious phallic symbol.
Oh yeah and there’s the cannonical ‘op is a douche’ thread he made last week. All the pieces are falling into place.
July 29, 2008 at 2:27 am
Caio… Jealous much?
Oh oh… and my trip to SE Asia was FREE.
What makes you think that the only images I took whilst away from home were of amusing things? If you prefer, I could submit some images of buildings or Buddhist temples.
What is this word “cannonical”? I ran a search but it spell corrected and defined it as some 15th century term that seems unrelated to anything I’ve posted. Can you clarify pretty please? Maybe that’s not in reference to me?
July 29, 2008 at 3:06 am
Well, by ‘canonical’ I mean standard and generally recognized. I think if some new person were to ask “Can you show me an example of someone being a complete and total douche on MCS” I think virtually everyone would point to your piercing-lesbian thread. You’re the “Piano C Major” of idiots. You’re the “Amo Amas Amat” of completely clueless morons. You’re lesson one: You’re so immediately obvious and widely accepted for what you are that you’re the basics.
No, thought, I’m not particularly jealous of your trip. I probably speak more languages than you’ve been to countries. I was giggling over bad English and foreign phallic symbols when you were in diapers. What concerns me is that I was, like, 12 and you look like you’re in your twenties.
July 29, 2008 at 3:33 am
Wow, serious business. Quick, everyone give a shit or they’ll cry.
July 29, 2008 at 3:55 am
I did not post a piercing-lesbian thread. *confused look*
Good for you that you speak multiple languages. I haven’t met anyone who speaks as many languages as countries I have visited (at least 10). If you do so, kudos. I’ve personally only studied four languages but I’m not fluent in any beyond English.
To be totally honest, your response doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. I can see the words but if there’s a point beyond “I don’t like your posts, therefore I don’t like you”, I’m not seeing it and the way that you are expressing your feelings towards me suggests that perhaps you are externalizing your douchieness onto me.
I’m totally fine with you not liking my pictures/posts, etc. I am a new poster to MCS and considering the average rating of my posts so far have been 4.5, I have the feeling that not everyone agrees with you.
But, if it will help, I will try to do better to please your douchiness in the future.
July 29, 2008 at 3:57 am
Oh, I forgot to add. I am not in my twenties. The whole “I was here first” argument is banal anyhow.
July 29, 2008 at 4:55 am
“To be totally honest, your response doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. I can see the words but if there’s a point beyond “I don’t like your posts, therefore I don’t like youâ€Â,
I said you were a douche, then I explained that you are a douche but you’ll never understand why. And then you act like a douche but don’t really get it. It’s a beautiful little dance.
July 29, 2008 at 5:23 am
@Caio
Your name isn’t Oleg, is it? You sound a lot like an Oleg I once knew.
July 29, 2008 at 5:45 am
No. It’s Caio.
July 29, 2008 at 7:01 am
I KNEW IT! Caio just admitted he follows people from other threads and launches childish attacks on those that disagree with him.
What a douche.
July 29, 2008 at 5:57 pm
Huh?