@tiki
I was *trying* to throw a bone showing an example for the left acting dumb, but apparently I failed. But, seriously, kids: there are some.

I never explicitly said that fox news was a victim, just that it was possible. Learn to read fucko. Also tone is kinda hard to convey in written conversation. Also that oven trick worked pretty well. i am dead sucking the devils cock and playing with my ding a lang a ding dong. You on the other hand are still a pompous self absorbed fuck who likes to hear himself talk.

f I say that reverend wright’s infamous sermon was spliced together to frame obama, I’m asking to catch a bit of flak.

You must have missed the memo that came out afterwards. That’s exactly what happened. Anyone that’s ever been in a southern bastist church knows exactly how those sermons go.

Act 1: The preacher’s all hellfire and brimstone telling you how the world is going to hell, and you’re the cause of it.

Act 2: Judgement day is right around the corner, you will be judged and you will go to hell.

Act 3: but there’s a loophole! They then tell you how you can avoid this fate, and how you can help the world.

Fox News, and MSM in general were focusing on acts 1 and 2. When there was a general religious understanding of the material, it was dropped from the public hivemind.

“Couldn’t it be possible that the above picture is a shopped screenshot in order to discredit fox? I mean a lot of people hate fox news and well, the left wing has this way of stooping really low to get their point across”

Sorry, there must be some other way to interpret those words that I happened to miss. And yes, I tried to use humor/sarcasm, because this isn’t the most sober of environments.

But really, it was a fairly absurd point to make that fox was the victim. If I say that reverend wright’s infamous sermon was spliced together to frame obama, I’m asking to catch a bit of flak.

So, how about you look at the tone of my responses, compare them to what you wrote in reply, ad kindly stick your head in the oven? (I’ll wait)

If you look again, you’ll see that I didn’t attack a person, I addressed your argument – even if I treated it with less than the reverence you apparently expect.

Thank you for being rational and respectful in your response to me.

@ chris hates freedom.

Fuck you, I never said it was a leftist conspiracy or anything in that rediculous and false second post that you made to mock me. And for the record i am not some paranoid right winger like you seem to think i am. I am an independent who is fucking disgusted of people like you who butcher and lampoon the words of others to get a point across or because the person disagrees with them on some stupid fucking issue. Speak to me when you can actually articulate a valid and respectful response or something other than ” HAHAH REPUBLICENZ R STOOPID, U R STUPID BECAUSE U SOUND LIKE A REPOOPLICAN!” Until then go back to your dime-a-dozen Edgy political blog where you will no doubt jack off into your face bewildered by your own musings.

Sure, they’re left of the Republicans, but that by no means makes them left-wing.

The centre of American politics is no where near the centre of the political spectrum.

Capitalism is right-wing. Corporations are about as right-wing as you can get.

CNN and NBC are corporations; they are right-wing by definition.

Naturally, it piqued my interest. From what I remember, the guy is apparently some other editor/reporter who works for another news network(I want to say the NY Times, but I can’t remember exactly). Anyway, he recently criticized Fox News about something, so Fox retaliated by saying the guy was only “attacking” them because he has an axe to grind due to the fact Fox News apparently fired the guy a few years ago when he used to work for them. This, somehow, lead to them to taking the 4chan approach to defending themself.