Awesome Mustang

Posted on June 22, 2008 by tiki god |
Filed Under Images and has these tags:
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (13 votes, average: 4.46 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

mustang-yellowish-orange-500x375 Awesome Mustang





Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge.



15 Responses to “Awesome Mustang”

  1. LukeV1-5 on June 22nd, 2008 7:05 am

    First glance, I thought they had put speakers in the goram radiator.

  2. ttudrew98 on June 22nd, 2008 12:19 pm

    Is that bumblebee?

  3. AppleSauce on June 22nd, 2008 1:22 pm

    “Is that bumblebee?”

    You’re lucky I don’t know you personal, I’d tear you apart.

    Bumblebee was a Camaro.
    This is a Mustang.

    ’nuff said.

  4. awfulintentions on June 22nd, 2008 2:13 pm

    Good boy, Applesauce, for not saying Barricade was a mustang, else I would tear you apart. :p

    Barricade is a Saleen, which is 300 times better then this pos.

  5. TrikYodz on June 22nd, 2008 2:16 pm

    ditto
    but i think if they WERE to make a real bumble bee make it a fucking VW beetle so theres a reason for the gay name and the cool car,
    either make this or the camaro the sidekick car
    but with the character Hot rod
    instead of bumble bee

  6. hvymetal86 on June 22nd, 2008 2:48 pm

    @TrikYodz

    Its not actually ALL the movie producers’ fault that Bumblebee was a Camaro. They approached VW about using the classic Beetle, and VW were dicks about it and told them if they wanted to use a beetle they had to use the new one.

  7. LukeV1-5 on June 22nd, 2008 3:32 pm

    Plus, Beetles are not good cars. They run on elastic bands and Germany.

  8. pauld on June 22nd, 2008 3:49 pm

    There is nothing awesome about orange cars.

    I don’t care if it’s the friggin’ Batmobile. If it’s orange, it’s lame.

  9. dekay46 on June 22nd, 2008 6:18 pm

    i call bullshit… the title is an oxymoron.

  10. dekay46 on June 22nd, 2008 6:29 pm

    also…

    2009 ford mustang: 210hp 4.0L V6.
    1989 Nissan 300ZX 220hp 3.0L V6.

    mathematical proof that mustangs suck.

  11. awfulintentions on June 22nd, 2008 7:14 pm

    Eh, as said, it wasn’t Bay’s fault for not getting the VW. Though I preferred the old Camaro they used versus the new one. Then again, Camaro’s are like assholes, everyone has one.

    Dekay, I know what will kick both car’s asses.
    71 Pontiac Fire Formula with the 455hp V8 engine.

    Oh baby. . .

  12. awfulintentions on June 22nd, 2008 7:17 pm

    Ugh. Firebird. Where’s the edit button when you need it?

  13. dekay46 on June 22nd, 2008 8:04 pm

    yes, but that’s a V8… all i was saying is that the japs did more with less… 20 years ago.

  14. awfulintentions on June 22nd, 2008 9:41 pm

    Hmmm, how about a straight six ‘67 Firebird? :p That’d still eat both of those cars. XD And thats, hmm, 41 years ago?

    Anyways, though, just because it looks like it has more, there are other things to factor in. That doesn’t mean a mustang isn’t shit, they are quite frankly. Yet, with Solstice only have the choice of a 4 cylinder or a V6 ( you’re better of with the 4, the V6 really isn’t too much more with a Pontiac and it sips gas ) they still go like stink. I drive a Grand Am, which technically has the same engine as the lovely Solstice, and it runs damn good, and would probably eat that pos Mustang in that picture for din-din. XD

    I’d still take a Saleen though if someone gave me one. :)

  15. Excelsior on June 23rd, 2008 6:24 am

    Hard to beat Germany when it comes to hp/L, my old M3 made 333hp from 3.3L, NA

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.