Sleeping Bag Shaped Like Your Body

Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge. All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.

Comments are automatically closed after 30 days.

18 Responses to “Sleeping Bag Shaped Like Your Body”

1. 

   ogie

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 8:23 am

   how are you supposed to have drunk ’sleeping bag sex’ in that thing ….i guess masturbation is your only option

2. 

   suicydking

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 8:27 am

   The two shots on the right remind me of Ed Nortonin in costume in Death To Smoochy for some reason.

3. 

   bright green

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 8:51 am

   Want one.

4. 

   Error401

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:10 am

   I wonder what the “model names” are. Chedar, Gumby and Snowflake.

5. 

   Max

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:18 am

   I want the shit out of that. Perfect for backpacking in the colorado mountains (I’ve done it three times. Not sure what that makes me)

   Also, Error (it’s cheddar)

   Also, this is the first time I’ve been able to log in for over a week. In the off-chance tiki reads this: Should I be worried?

6. 

   unknown

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:24 am

   The problem is that these “bags” have a larger surface area than regular bags and thus they waste a lot more heat. One would have to carry a thicker and heavier “bag.” And heavier is not an option while backpacking.

   So, leave these to the stupid trendies who never need them and for whom they were intended.

7. 

   jose_lucca

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:39 am

   agreed x10 with unknown. looks like it would take up half of your pack space. Its still friggin cool though. I think the German military used to issue a bag similar to this but apparently it was crap.

8. 

   Error401

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:59 am

   @Max, I can’t log in with Firefox (used to work 100%), now it’ll say logged in, but it isn’t. IE6 works fine, but I don’t like it. It’s been about a week since FF quit working for me here. And yes, my speel check didn’t catch that missing d.

9. 

   tiki god

   on May 2nd, 2008 at 10:58 am

   it’s a cookies issue. about two weeks ago I had to completely mess them all up due to some upgrades around these here parts. clear out the FF cache and cookies, and you should be golden

10. 

    stpgod

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    I totally saved this photo and was going to upload it today. But I see Kaniza has stolen my glory…

    Back to the tubes….

11. 

    chillin789

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:27 pm

    dorky. looks like a columbia winter suit my son had when he was a f***kin year old.

12. 

    Max

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    @Error:
    Thanks, guess I’ll have to use IE now….
    I hate it.

13. 

    reboot

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    @Error and Max
    I’m using FF and it works just fine.

14. 

    Error401

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    Seems to be working for me now, but this workstation is getting replaced asap (new one got here this morning). The old one has been wonky for a while now, I thought it was just my system. As a side note, this WS will lock up if I open a page with an embedded wmv file, but I can watch youtube all day long (I know, YT is flash, but still).

15. 

    tiki god

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    MCS doesn’t have any wmv files in it, lol

16. 

    Error401

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    I know, but others do, sometimes they’re land mines when I bring em up. Literally locks my cpu up. I can’t complain to IT, cause well, I’d be griping to myself. The odd thing is since posting comments on this post, FF is working again (this morning it wasn’t). F’n computers.

17. 

    Phyreblade

    on May 2nd, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    How to look like Gumby, in one easy step…

18. 

    bennylenny88

    on July 21st, 2008 at 5:06 pm

    “im so cool!”