DHMO Kills!

Posted on April 8, 2008 by tiki god |
Filed Under Uncategorized and has these tags: ,
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 3.71 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

dhmo-kills.jpg





Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge.



21 Responses to “DHMO Kills!”

  1. MacheteJak on April 8th, 2008 3:06 pm Reply to this comment

    Why you should ALWAYS ask more questions, especaially from the Internet.

  2. MacheteJak on April 8th, 2008 3:06 pm Reply to this comment

    *especially. Sorry.

  3. purple banana on April 8th, 2008 3:11 pm Reply to this comment

    KILL IT WITH FIRE

  4. CaptainBobo on April 8th, 2008 3:11 pm Reply to this comment

    dihydrogen= H2
    Monoxide = o
    dihydrogen monoxide = H2O

    JESUS TURDS, LETS EVAPORATE THAT SHIT!

  5. RSIxidor on April 8th, 2008 3:18 pm Reply to this comment

    I think this may be the best cause ever.

  6. RSIxidor on April 8th, 2008 3:19 pm Reply to this comment

    And it made me think about Arrested Development, which is awesome. The episode where they had a charity diner for a fake disease. Fucking awesome.

  7. JoeCrow on April 8th, 2008 3:24 pm Reply to this comment

    Beat me to it Bobo, Lawl. BAN WATER

  8. Tardex on April 8th, 2008 3:35 pm Reply to this comment

    Holy fuck tiki. This is so freakin old. Ok it may not be a repost, but shit, this whole joke thing about H20 happened a few years ago.

  9. Professor Ratbaggy on April 8th, 2008 3:57 pm Reply to this comment

    Anyway, it should be hydrogen hydroxide.  Makes much more sense.

  10. deuce on April 8th, 2008 4:06 pm Reply to this comment

    One of my college science teachers pulled this on the entire class one time… gave us a group in-class project on it. One of the guys in my group figured it out, but almost everyone else in the class fell for it.

    Granted, this was in 1998, before the internets expanded their series of tubes into everyone’s living rooms.

  11. Tardex on April 8th, 2008 4:26 pm Reply to this comment

    @ Professor Ratbabby

    No it shouldn’t, even if it was a hydroxide bonding with a singular hydrogen which would then leave a single hydrogen molecule which CANNOT exist without another to stabilize it, it would thusly become H20, Dihydrogen monoxide, not hydrogen hydroxide.

  12. reboot on April 8th, 2008 4:41 pm Reply to this comment

    @Tardex
    No, the Professor had it right. Think of Lithium Hydroxide, which is perfectly valid nomenclature.

  13. numb7rs on April 8th, 2008 4:49 pm Reply to this comment

    @ Professor & Tardex
    Stick it under stupidly high pressure, so that the hydrogen become metallic, giving rise to hydrogen hydroxide.

  14. mex_hustler on April 8th, 2008 4:57 pm Reply to this comment

    Mah Beer NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

  15. Tardex on April 8th, 2008 6:35 pm Reply to this comment

    @Reboot and numb7rs

    Hydrogen is not a metal, though it is on side of metal side of the periodic table, it is still diatomic and cannot exist by itself. Now if what numb7rs says was actually physically possible than the problem would be solved.

  16. reboot on April 8th, 2008 6:54 pm Reply to this comment

    @Tardex
    Hydrogen is a metal under correct conditions
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
    Pure H2 is not the only source of hydrogen in a reaction. Consider, in the Bronsted-Lowery theory, the equilibrium water reaction is:
    H30^- + OH^- 2 H20
    So you clearly have a hydroxide ion (OH) that gains a hydrogen from the hydronium ion (H3O) to form hydrogen hydroxide aka water.

  17. reboot on April 8th, 2008 6:55 pm Reply to this comment

    oops, hydronium should have a positive charge in that reaction.

  18. natedog on April 8th, 2008 6:58 pm Reply to this comment

    you fuckers better not fuck up the beer

  19. CaptainBobo on April 9th, 2008 12:17 am Reply to this comment

    Well, in most normal condition, water is at equilibirum in the Bronsted-Lowery theory, in which the conversion of water into the base (-OH-) and the acid (H3O+) from water stays at a constant rate, in which you could probably never isolate either -OH- or H3O+. Remember, this is all theory (a theory that works really well), but you cannot isolate -OH-, only if you were to use a positive metal to attract -OH-, then you’re just cheating.

  20. reboot on April 9th, 2008 12:48 am Reply to this comment

    @CaptianBobo
    You’ve got the chemistry basically right, but I don’t see how that’s cheating! If I need to add hydroxide to a reaction I’m probably going to use something like Sodium Hydroxide. That’s not cheating, that’s just like using a bucket to carry water.

  21. coolghoul on April 9th, 2008 6:37 am Reply to this comment

    While we are banning DHMO we should also end Women’s Suffrage!!! END WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE TODAY!!!!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.