<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheism By Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/</link>
	<description>My Confined Space is an image blog with user submitted pictures of anything and everything, funny, serious or dark.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:01:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smedlorificus</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-102177</link>
		<dc:creator>Smedlorificus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-102177</guid>
		<description>Win if true. Otherwise, dreadfully faily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Win if true. Otherwise, dreadfully faily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockyabq</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-102148</link>
		<dc:creator>rockyabq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-102148</guid>
		<description>% of theists who make it to the fictional heaven:

0%

--------

I do not &quot;believe&quot; there is no God, I&#039;m convinced that no God or gods exist.  I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one.

One might ask, &quot;Isn&#039;t belief that there is not a god just as irrational, arrogant, etc. as belief that there IS a god?&quot;  No, for several reasons.  First of all, I do not &quot;believe&quot; that there is not a God.  Belief has nothing to do with it.  I believe or don&#039;t believe my 4 year old daughter when she tells me she didn&#039;t make that mess on the floor.  I believe in justice and fair play (though I don&#039;t know exactly how we achieve them). I don&#039;t accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view.  My view is that the moon is made of rock.  If someone says to me, &quot;Well, you haven&#039;t BEEN there, have you?  You haven&#039;t seen it for yourself so MY view that it is made of Wisconsin pepperjack cheese is equally valid,&quot;  then I can&#039;t even be bothered to argue.  The burden of proof in the case of God, as in the case of the composition of the moon, has shifted radically.  God used to be the best explanation we had.  But we&#039;ve now got vastly better ones.  God is no longer an explanation of anything but has instead become something that would itself need an insurmountable amount of explaining.  So I don&#039;t think that being convinced that there is no God is as irrational or arrogant a point of view as belief that there is.  The matter does not call for evenhandedness at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>% of theists who make it to the fictional heaven:</p>
<p>0%</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I do not &#8220;believe&#8221; there is no God, I&#8217;m convinced that no God or gods exist.  I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one.</p>
<p>One might ask, &#8220;Isn&#8217;t belief that there is not a god just as irrational, arrogant, etc. as belief that there IS a god?&#8221;  No, for several reasons.  First of all, I do not &#8220;believe&#8221; that there is not a God.  Belief has nothing to do with it.  I believe or don&#8217;t believe my 4 year old daughter when she tells me she didn&#8217;t make that mess on the floor.  I believe in justice and fair play (though I don&#8217;t know exactly how we achieve them). I don&#8217;t accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view.  My view is that the moon is made of rock.  If someone says to me, &#8220;Well, you haven&#8217;t BEEN there, have you?  You haven&#8217;t seen it for yourself so MY view that it is made of Wisconsin pepperjack cheese is equally valid,&#8221;  then I can&#8217;t even be bothered to argue.  The burden of proof in the case of God, as in the case of the composition of the moon, has shifted radically.  God used to be the best explanation we had.  But we&#8217;ve now got vastly better ones.  God is no longer an explanation of anything but has instead become something that would itself need an insurmountable amount of explaining.  So I don&#8217;t think that being convinced that there is no God is as irrational or arrogant a point of view as belief that there is.  The matter does not call for evenhandedness at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natedog</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-102078</link>
		<dc:creator>natedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-102078</guid>
		<description>trollin&#039; wit da homies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trollin&#8217; wit da homies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natedog</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-102077</link>
		<dc:creator>natedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-102077</guid>
		<description>% of atheists who make it to heaven:

0%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>% of atheists who make it to heaven:</p>
<p>0%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rattybad</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-102070</link>
		<dc:creator>rattybad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-102070</guid>
		<description>I think it was in a Tom Robbins novel, maybe Another Roadside Attraction, where he says, something like, &quot;People will give you the same stupid look if you tell them God doesn&#039;t exist as they will if you say that He does.&quot;

...Which is probably why every post about religion around here is 30+ comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was in a Tom Robbins novel, maybe Another Roadside Attraction, where he says, something like, &#8220;People will give you the same stupid look if you tell them God doesn&#8217;t exist as they will if you say that He does.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;Which is probably why every post about religion around here is 30+ comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelotuseater725</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101766</link>
		<dc:creator>thelotuseater725</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101766</guid>
		<description>&quot;If there is a â€˜godâ€™ and this god is truly supposed to be omnipotent, then why does this god need us here on earth to pray and worship them. The entire basis of modern religions is flawed.&quot;


Where does it say that god &quot;needs&quot; us? If god exists ( personally i think he  or it does) and created us how could one logically argue that an all powerful superior intelligence would need an underling to reassure his existence or to give glory,? In Judaism/Christianity man was not created to worship god otherwise he would not have been imbued with freewill and on top of that the sole purpose of the Angels is to worship and serve god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If there is a â€˜godâ€™ and this god is truly supposed to be omnipotent, then why does this god need us here on earth to pray and worship them. The entire basis of modern religions is flawed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where does it say that god &#8220;needs&#8221; us? If god exists ( personally i think he  or it does) and created us how could one logically argue that an all powerful superior intelligence would need an underling to reassure his existence or to give glory,? In Judaism/Christianity man was not created to worship god otherwise he would not have been imbued with freewill and on top of that the sole purpose of the Angels is to worship and serve god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101749</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101749</guid>
		<description>@caio:
You could also check out Kant. He&#039;s a bit more idealistic, and where the means outweigh the ends. I dunno, check out a philosophy book on morality. You&#039;ll find quite a few viewpoints.
And quite a few without any sort of reference to God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@caio:<br />
You could also check out Kant. He&#8217;s a bit more idealistic, and where the means outweigh the ends. I dunno, check out a philosophy book on morality. You&#8217;ll find quite a few viewpoints.<br />
And quite a few without any sort of reference to God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdf</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101617</link>
		<dc:creator>asdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101617</guid>
		<description>this has nothing to do with anything but i like time bandits explanation about god and reason... so the devil a reasonable guy says god is such a dumbass for inventing butterflies, dandelions, and can you believe this slugs, things without purpose. if i was in charge i would have started with lasers, microwave ovens, televisions and computers i would have such a more purposeful world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this has nothing to do with anything but i like time bandits explanation about god and reason&#8230; so the devil a reasonable guy says god is such a dumbass for inventing butterflies, dandelions, and can you believe this slugs, things without purpose. if i was in charge i would have started with lasers, microwave ovens, televisions and computers i would have such a more purposeful world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgustipater</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101616</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgustipater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101616</guid>
		<description>I want that animated fractal sequence as a screensaver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want that animated fractal sequence as a screensaver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reboot</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101614</link>
		<dc:creator>reboot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101614</guid>
		<description>@Caio
Utilitarianism is not complete bullshit. It&#039;s also not the mathematically precise system of morals that Jeremy Bentham hoped it would be. And it really fails if when you are dealing with statistically large groups for exactly reasons you mentioned. 
Still, I do think it&#039;s valuable in a lot of personal ethics situations where you can have more or less complete information about what constitutes happiness for each of the involved players. 
Besides I only said that I consider those principles, not that I&#039;m slavishly devoted to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Caio<br />
Utilitarianism is not complete bullshit. It&#8217;s also not the mathematically precise system of morals that Jeremy Bentham hoped it would be. And it really fails if when you are dealing with statistically large groups for exactly reasons you mentioned.<br />
Still, I do think it&#8217;s valuable in a lot of personal ethics situations where you can have more or less complete information about what constitutes happiness for each of the involved players.<br />
Besides I only said that I consider those principles, not that I&#8217;m slavishly devoted to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101611</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101611</guid>
		<description>Seriously now.  Does mom know that your online again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously now.  Does mom know that your online again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101610</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101610</guid>
		<description>You make a few posts that are coherent.

And then lose the plot.

Then start personal insults, profanity, and multiple repeat posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a few posts that are coherent.</p>
<p>And then lose the plot.</p>
<p>Then start personal insults, profanity, and multiple repeat posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101609</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101609</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting trolling technique too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting trolling technique too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101608</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101608</guid>
		<description>Wow.  You&#039;re a bigger troll than I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  You&#8217;re a bigger troll than I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caio</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101600</link>
		<dc:creator>Caio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101600</guid>
		<description>And yes I realize that it was haelduksf who said that but I don&#039;t know who that is so I&#039;m blaming that shithead Ack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes I realize that it was haelduksf who said that but I don&#8217;t know who that is so I&#8217;m blaming that shithead Ack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caio</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101599</link>
		<dc:creator>Caio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101599</guid>
		<description>Also at ack, possibly the biggest cunt of them all: Have you considered the possibility that sneaky snake was being flip and funny? That&#039;s how I read it. That + being a fucking rascist shit makes you the biggest cunt on this site and the fact that you seem 100% earnest makes me actually miss Iddq you dumbfuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also at ack, possibly the biggest cunt of them all: Have you considered the possibility that sneaky snake was being flip and funny? That&#8217;s how I read it. That + being a fucking rascist shit makes you the biggest cunt on this site and the fact that you seem 100% earnest makes me actually miss Iddq you dumbfuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caio</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101598</link>
		<dc:creator>Caio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101598</guid>
		<description>@reboot: I agree with you in principle but Utilitarianism is bullshit. You&#039;ve got &#039;ends vs means&#039; &#039;the difficulty of predicting&#039;. Or howabout the fact that happiness is often not morally certain and in fact the great number of people are happy at the suffering of others. That kind of thinking would brutalize society. We&#039;d see the return of minorities being fed to the lions in the coliseums.

I agree that morality doesn&#039;t require God but please don&#039;t say &#039;utilitarianism&#039;. I hate that almost as much as Alec&#039;s inability to read an entire document before making a dumbass post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@reboot: I agree with you in principle but Utilitarianism is bullshit. You&#8217;ve got &#8216;ends vs means&#8217; &#8216;the difficulty of predicting&#8217;. Or howabout the fact that happiness is often not morally certain and in fact the great number of people are happy at the suffering of others. That kind of thinking would brutalize society. We&#8217;d see the return of minorities being fed to the lions in the coliseums.</p>
<p>I agree that morality doesn&#8217;t require God but please don&#8217;t say &#8216;utilitarianism&#8217;. I hate that almost as much as Alec&#8217;s inability to read an entire document before making a dumbass post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caio</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101597</link>
		<dc:creator>Caio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101597</guid>
		<description>@Alec: Read farther down, you ignorant illiterate cunt. It&#039;s after the church section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alec: Read farther down, you ignorant illiterate cunt. It&#8217;s after the church section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haelduksf</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101591</link>
		<dc:creator>haelduksf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101591</guid>
		<description>@SneakySnake:
www.adherents.com claims that there are 4200 different religions. Good luck picking the right one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SneakySnake:<br />
<a href="http://www.adherents.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adherents.com</a> claims that there are 4200 different religions. Good luck picking the right one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reboot</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101589</link>
		<dc:creator>reboot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101589</guid>
		<description>I told myself I wouldn&#039;t get in an internet argument today, but I just couldn&#039;t help it:
@thequietguy
&quot;Disbelief in divine cosmic order does not make you anymore intelligent. &quot;
This is actually a really good point. The video demonstrates that smart people tend to not believe in God. But it does not show that if someone stopped believing in God, they would suddenly become smart.
&quot;Atheists love to claim control over their existence and deny the very concept of predestination&quot;
I&#039;m an Atheist and I believe in determinism. Pretty much invalids your point right there.
&quot;Prove to me beyond all doubt that this experience, this dream of existence that we all are sharing, is not also happening to a Cosmic Awareness&quot;
I have no idea what you are talking about here. WTF is a Cosmic Awareness? When most of us talk about God we mean an omnipotent, benevolent lawgiver that demands that it be worshiped. If you&#039;re talking about something that doesn&#039;t meet that definition, that&#039;s a whole different argument.
@Snow
&quot;How would you know what is right and wrong?&quot;
The Categorical Imperative and Utilitarianism are two concepts that I think about when making moral decisions, neither require a God. In fact, you should read the Socrates&#039; dialogue with Euthyphro, where this exact question is discussed. Socrates argues that even if the Gods tell us what is right and wrong, that there still must be some reason why they Gods decide one thing is right and another wrong. So if we can figure one why how the Gods decide right and wrong, then we don&#039;t need the Gods to tell us right and wrong, we can figure it out for ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told myself I wouldn&#8217;t get in an internet argument today, but I just couldn&#8217;t help it:<br />
@thequietguy<br />
&#8220;Disbelief in divine cosmic order does not make you anymore intelligent. &#8221;<br />
This is actually a really good point. The video demonstrates that smart people tend to not believe in God. But it does not show that if someone stopped believing in God, they would suddenly become smart.<br />
&#8220;Atheists love to claim control over their existence and deny the very concept of predestination&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m an Atheist and I believe in determinism. Pretty much invalids your point right there.<br />
&#8220;Prove to me beyond all doubt that this experience, this dream of existence that we all are sharing, is not also happening to a Cosmic Awareness&#8221;<br />
I have no idea what you are talking about here. WTF is a Cosmic Awareness? When most of us talk about God we mean an omnipotent, benevolent lawgiver that demands that it be worshiped. If you&#8217;re talking about something that doesn&#8217;t meet that definition, that&#8217;s a whole different argument.<br />
@Snow<br />
&#8220;How would you know what is right and wrong?&#8221;<br />
The Categorical Imperative and Utilitarianism are two concepts that I think about when making moral decisions, neither require a God. In fact, you should read the Socrates&#8217; dialogue with Euthyphro, where this exact question is discussed. Socrates argues that even if the Gods tell us what is right and wrong, that there still must be some reason why they Gods decide one thing is right and another wrong. So if we can figure one why how the Gods decide right and wrong, then we don&#8217;t need the Gods to tell us right and wrong, we can figure it out for ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tardex</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101588</link>
		<dc:creator>Tardex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101588</guid>
		<description>If there is a &#039;god&#039; and this god is truly supposed to be omnipotent, then why does this god need us here on earth to pray and worship them.  The entire basis of modern religions is flawed.  I agree with AlecDalek on the subject really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a &#8216;god&#8217; and this god is truly supposed to be omnipotent, then why does this god need us here on earth to pray and worship them.  The entire basis of modern religions is flawed.  I agree with AlecDalek on the subject really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlecDalek</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101587</link>
		<dc:creator>AlecDalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101587</guid>
		<description>@Caio

Nice try, but you&#039;re comparing measurements of two separate things.  The video only stated that x number of Europeans don&#039;t believe in a personal god.  Your stat just shows x number of people that attend services.  Correlation does no mean causation.  I grew up going to church, and I can honestly say, I think at least Half of the congregation weren&#039;t &quot;believers&quot;, they&#039;re there because of who they married (or who they want to marry), other such reasons.

I&#039;m not say either stat us right or wrong, I&#039;m just pointing out they don&#039;t measure the same thing, therefore, they are not comparable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Caio</p>
<p>Nice try, but you&#8217;re comparing measurements of two separate things.  The video only stated that x number of Europeans don&#8217;t believe in a personal god.  Your stat just shows x number of people that attend services.  Correlation does no mean causation.  I grew up going to church, and I can honestly say, I think at least Half of the congregation weren&#8217;t &#8220;believers&#8221;, they&#8217;re there because of who they married (or who they want to marry), other such reasons.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not say either stat us right or wrong, I&#8217;m just pointing out they don&#8217;t measure the same thing, therefore, they are not comparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101571</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101571</guid>
		<description>^^^ Sorry there buddy, but Webster.com disagrees...
Atheism - a disbelief in the existence of deity

Sorry, but NEED is not a part of Atheism.

Personally, I think that we do need a God.  One who is consistent, reliable, and powerful enough to wright the wrongs of humanity.  

However, need does not create God.

And I am not willing to settle for fictitious bullshit in place of such a being.

That is what makes me an Atheist.  I simply do not have faith in God or my fellow man.  For me &quot;faith&quot; =  &quot;gullibility&quot;, and I want no part of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^ Sorry there buddy, but <a href="http://Webster.com" title="http://Webster.com" class="autohyperlink" target="_blank">Webster.com</a> disagrees&#8230;<br />
Atheism &#8211; a disbelief in the existence of deity</p>
<p>Sorry, but NEED is not a part of Atheism.</p>
<p>Personally, I think that we do need a God.  One who is consistent, reliable, and powerful enough to wright the wrongs of humanity.  </p>
<p>However, need does not create God.</p>
<p>And I am not willing to settle for fictitious bullshit in place of such a being.</p>
<p>That is what makes me an Atheist.  I simply do not have faith in God or my fellow man.  For me &#8220;faith&#8221; =  &#8220;gullibility&#8221;, and I want no part of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stalwart</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101564</link>
		<dc:creator>stalwart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101564</guid>
		<description>Atheism is NOT the belief that there is no God, but the belief that there is no need for a God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atheism is NOT the belief that there is no God, but the belief that there is no need for a God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stalwart</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-101563</link>
		<dc:creator>stalwart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/04/06/atheism-by-statistics/#comment-101563</guid>
		<description>@ the quietguy

&gt; Disbelief in divine cosmic order does not make you anymore intelligent. In fact itâ€™s amazing how much energy is expended trying to rationalize away the incredible synchronous coincidence that displays itself at every turn for those who care to look. Atheists love to claim control over their existence and deny the very concept of predestination, how feeble minded or willfully ignorant do you have to be to not realize that the miraculous paradox of reality is that both freewill and destiny exist simultaneously depending on your level of perception, which is a function of how much information your awareness can process, concerning the dynamics of the fundamental elements comprising the reality you are perceiving.
I experience this material universe through my physical senses, which themselves are complex electro-chemical interactions afforded a brief existence by the virtue of their shape interaction with the machinery of my brain. The brain that is merely a physical manifestation of the cosmic possibility of me. An astounding series of random events had to take place before I could type out this Rant of Wisdom, yet here it is.
Prove to me beyond all doubt that this experience, this dream of existence that we all are sharing, is not also happening to a Cosmic Awareness, that is for the moment beyond our ability perceive. I canâ€™t prove the existence of The God, but I canâ€™t disprove it either. All I know is what I am personally living through, and I feel the presence of something more. Even if itâ€™s only chemistry it still serves the purpose of experiencing this grand creation.
If you give me pills that silence the voice of the universe, show me the folly of religion and convince me that this is all one big nothing.

How will that make me a healthier, happier, more intelligent human being?

You strike me as a deist...well, that is the first step towards atheism...I wish you well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ the quietguy</p>
<p>&gt; Disbelief in divine cosmic order does not make you anymore intelligent. In fact itâ€™s amazing how much energy is expended trying to rationalize away the incredible synchronous coincidence that displays itself at every turn for those who care to look. Atheists love to claim control over their existence and deny the very concept of predestination, how feeble minded or willfully ignorant do you have to be to not realize that the miraculous paradox of reality is that both freewill and destiny exist simultaneously depending on your level of perception, which is a function of how much information your awareness can process, concerning the dynamics of the fundamental elements comprising the reality you are perceiving.<br />
I experience this material universe through my physical senses, which themselves are complex electro-chemical interactions afforded a brief existence by the virtue of their shape interaction with the machinery of my brain. The brain that is merely a physical manifestation of the cosmic possibility of me. An astounding series of random events had to take place before I could type out this Rant of Wisdom, yet here it is.<br />
Prove to me beyond all doubt that this experience, this dream of existence that we all are sharing, is not also happening to a Cosmic Awareness, that is for the moment beyond our ability perceive. I canâ€™t prove the existence of The God, but I canâ€™t disprove it either. All I know is what I am personally living through, and I feel the presence of something more. Even if itâ€™s only chemistry it still serves the purpose of experiencing this grand creation.<br />
If you give me pills that silence the voice of the universe, show me the folly of religion and convince me that this is all one big nothing.</p>
<p>How will that make me a healthier, happier, more intelligent human being?</p>
<p>You strike me as a deist&#8230;well, that is the first step towards atheism&#8230;I wish you well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
