Questionable art

pubichair.jpg (431 KB)

Is a giant metal pubic hair really art?


Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    9 Comment threads
    0 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    5 Comment authors
    Brevity TrutaCaiorattybadGilezsaborlas Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Saborlas
    Member

    No, it is not. Once you let shit like this be called “art,” you’ve declared that talent is no longer a requirement.

    Gilez
    Member

    Ain’t denver great for questionable art?

    rattybad
    Member

    I think the point of art like this is to suggest that art doesn’t have to be purposeful or realistic. People love Salvador Dali, but it’s fucking melted clocks…how is that art? For that matter, how is the Mona Lisa art–it’s just a woman sitting there, right? Does art necessarily have to be beautiful or realistic? Take a look at Peter Voulkos’s “Rocking Pot” which makes a case that pottery does not have to be functional, either:

    comment image

    Brevity Truta
    Member

    Just because you don’t find something artful, doesn’t mean it’s not art. I prefer art that’s less about making a statement of the time or artist’s ego or intellect than about reaching into the soul of humanity and or the world and capturing something timeless and true about it. That sculpture doesn’t appeal to me, because it’s got to be all statement. The rocking pot is similar, to me. It’s kind of more artful, though. Dali also, despite his technical ability, is a statement kind of artist – he lacks soul. I do like a couple of his paintings, but… Read more »

    Caio
    Member

    comment image

    Brevity Truta
    Member

    ^ Them’s fighting words =)

    Interesting guy, just looked him up on the wiki. One of his pieces was posted here a couple of days ago, I notice. His anonymity reminds me of olden times, when artists were not Names, but Makers.

    Caio
    Member

    Ok I’m trying to figure out what this legitimate piece of art is *about*:

    www.slashfood.com/2008/02/20/7-200-bananas-make-a-lot-of-banana-bread-or-art/

    Here are my ideas:

    1) Art is frivolous?
    2) Art should not only have no substance, but should steal food out of starving mouths?
    3) The artist really likes the colour yellow.

    Brevity Truta
    Member

    You’re onto something with 1 and 2, though 3 might mean that the guy’s paying for his self-indulgent 1 and 2 by the turning black and brown of his beloved yellow … symbolising moral decay, the fleetingness of perfection, societ –

    ah fucksake. It’s bad, bad art and deserves a D-Day torpedo up it’s pretentious ass.

    And the waste bugs me, too. There is only one Cristo. And he didn’t use bananas.

    Where did you find that, Caio? Googling “Bad Art”?

    Brevity Truta
    Member

    ps should have capitalized Factory now that I look around, hehehe.



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Motorcycles Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas