An Interesting Take on Hillary’s Campaign

Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge. All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.

Comments are automatically closed after 30 days.

11 Responses to “An Interesting Take on Hillary’s Campaign”

1. 

   hvymetal86

   on February 27th, 2008 at 9:03 am

   Hell fuckin yeah I second that.

2. 

   angrymatt

   on February 27th, 2008 at 9:38 am

   Hardly interesting. Very YAWN worthy. Too wordy to be snappy, too base to be real criticism. And if you take your political cues from a muffler shop sign, you shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

3. 

   natedog

   on February 27th, 2008 at 9:46 am

   i was listening to some comedian the other day; i can’t remember who the hell it was. i think it was a white guy. not sure though.

   anyway, he was talking about how if Hillary won, someday she’d be sitting at her desk in the Oval Office, thinking about how ‘ol Bill got blowed in that thar chair, with ‘the button’ in easy reach. throw the obligatory once a month bloody cooter into the mix, and you have a very volatile situation on your hands.

   lol

4. 

   morbo

   on February 27th, 2008 at 10:01 am

   except for the fact that she’s 60 and therefore most deffinately gone through menopause so it’s not a once a month situation but rather anytime she gets a hot falsh situation.

5. 

   deuce

   on February 27th, 2008 at 11:28 am

   Wow… misogyny in a Hillary Clinton thread? That’s a first.

6. 

   elzarcothepale

   on February 27th, 2008 at 4:16 pm

   misogyny on the internet?
   call the god damned Batman!

7. 

   Caio

   on February 27th, 2008 at 5:49 pm

   I would be funny, except the same joke has been going around in the form of a pic of a much better-worded bumper sticker for months.

8. 

   wigg1es

   on February 28th, 2008 at 12:10 am

   Anyone who says “aint” in everyday speech probably shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

9. 

   reboot

   on February 28th, 2008 at 12:33 am

   “ain’t” is a perfectly valid in contraction of “am” and “not”. In this context, it is proper English with a tradition going back to Chaucer and Shakespeare.
   While we are on the subject, “ya’ll” is a decent form of 2nd person plural, a pronoun that is otherwise missing from American English.

10. 

    Caio

    on February 28th, 2008 at 12:49 am

    My language has four second person plural personal pronouns, while English speakers seems to struggle with only one. I think that makes me genetically superior, dude.

11. 

    nippletwister

    on March 3rd, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    I suppose that is pretty witty, for a dickless inbred white trash retard, Uh, I mean Republican.
    Nobody is fooled, you ignorant piece of dogshit-everyone knows that worthless, dickless, genocide-loving republicans(and sadly, even a few democrats) are way too bigoted and cowardly to ever vote for a woman(or a black person, for that matter.)
    So go ahead and keep anouncing to the world what a close-minded cretin you are.