<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waterboarding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/</link>
	<description>My Confined Space is an image blog with user submitted pictures of anything and everything, funny, serious or dark.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: reboot</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-94203</link>
		<dc:creator>reboot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-94203</guid>
		<description>In a information complete, logical world, those would be the three conclusions. But you haven&#039;t considered scenario&#039;s that are information incomplete (that is, you don&#039;t have a way of confirming the information is true even after investigation).
Suppose the interrogator asks &quot;who are the other members of your terrorist cell?&quot;.  The detainee, who is not a terrorist, is tortured until he names 3 random people. Those three people are each tortured until they name three random people. Since you are in Iraq, one of those people might actually be a terrorist, just by chance. And when they go to his house and find a bunch of bombs and guns, they conclude that the operation was a success, even though its nothing but random chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a information complete, logical world, those would be the three conclusions. But you haven&#8217;t considered scenario&#8217;s that are information incomplete (that is, you don&#8217;t have a way of confirming the information is true even after investigation).<br />
Suppose the interrogator asks &#8220;who are the other members of your terrorist cell?&#8221;.  The detainee, who is not a terrorist, is tortured until he names 3 random people. Those three people are each tortured until they name three random people. Since you are in Iraq, one of those people might actually be a terrorist, just by chance. And when they go to his house and find a bunch of bombs and guns, they conclude that the operation was a success, even though its nothing but random chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foinlavin</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-94197</link>
		<dc:creator>Foinlavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-94197</guid>
		<description>Watched the video.

If the U.S.&#039;s position is that we have only water-boarded three detainees ever, then one of three things is going on.
1.  It doesn&#039;t work, so we stopped.
2.  It does work so we keep doing it but do not tell everyone because it makes fine upstanding citizens like yourself upset.
3.  It does not work but we keep doing it for sport.

http://thehill.com/byron-york/when-waterboarding-works-2007-12-13.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the video.</p>
<p>If the U.S.&#8217;s position is that we have only water-boarded three detainees ever, then one of three things is going on.<br />
1.  It doesn&#8217;t work, so we stopped.<br />
2.  It does work so we keep doing it but do not tell everyone because it makes fine upstanding citizens like yourself upset.<br />
3.  It does not work but we keep doing it for sport.</p>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/byron-york/when-waterboarding-works-2007-12-13.html" rel="nofollow">thehill.com/byron-york/when-waterboarding-works-2007-12-13.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiki god</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-94192</link>
		<dc:creator>tiki god</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-94192</guid>
		<description>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/former-fbi-agent-ticking-bomb-scenario-is-a-red-herring/

former FBI interrogator on the subject</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/former-fbi-agent-ticking-bomb-scenario-is-a-red-herring/" rel="nofollow">thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/former-fbi-agent-ticking-bomb-scenario-is-a-red-herring/</a></p>
<p>former FBI interrogator on the subject</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiki god</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-94114</link>
		<dc:creator>tiki god</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-94114</guid>
		<description>@Foinlavin

but that&#039;s just the problem.  torture &lt;strong&gt;will never&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;has never&lt;/strong&gt; worked in a &quot;ticking time bomb&quot; situation.  Not that there&#039;s ever even remotely been anything that would prove this (really? ticking time bombs?) but logically if a terrorist knew when the ticking would end, and the blowing up began, why not just hold out till then?  Shit, why wait till then?  Tell them your entire story, all James Bond style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Foinlavin</p>
<p>but that&#8217;s just the problem.  torture <strong>will never</strong> and <strong>has never</strong> worked in a &#8220;ticking time bomb&#8221; situation.  Not that there&#8217;s ever even remotely been anything that would prove this (really? ticking time bombs?) but logically if a terrorist knew when the ticking would end, and the blowing up began, why not just hold out till then?  Shit, why wait till then?  Tell them your entire story, all James Bond style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foinlavin</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-94109</link>
		<dc:creator>Foinlavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-94109</guid>
		<description>@ Howie Feltersnatch
It was &quot;the shield&quot;, but early in the first season, I guess they had not established how crazy the character was going to be on a regular basis.  

OK, so the consensuses can safely be said to be that torture as a matter of policy is a bad idea but torture may be an option in an extreme situation with a ticking time bomb and an orphanage and the water supply and a impending assassination with a imminent chemical attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Howie Feltersnatch<br />
It was &#8220;the shield&#8221;, but early in the first season, I guess they had not established how crazy the character was going to be on a regular basis.  </p>
<p>OK, so the consensuses can safely be said to be that torture as a matter of policy is a bad idea but torture may be an option in an extreme situation with a ticking time bomb and an orphanage and the water supply and a impending assassination with a imminent chemical attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffaristocrat</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-94033</link>
		<dc:creator>ffaristocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-94033</guid>
		<description>Two facts:

1. Torture doesn&#039;t work.
2. Torture is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two facts:</p>
<p>1. Torture doesn&#8217;t work.<br />
2. Torture is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-93979</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-93979</guid>
		<description>Holy shit guys. I need to get my home computer working, cause missing this thing until I got to work sucks.
Anyways, lots of good arguments in here (though Bordero pissed me off with 90% of what he said). Since he&#039;s been thoroughly flamed off this thread, I can safely congratulate you, and award you with one internet (collectively). I can really agree with a lot of what you guys said (especially the wrong but necessary occasionally angle, I&#039;ve always wondered about that).
well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit guys. I need to get my home computer working, cause missing this thing until I got to work sucks.<br />
Anyways, lots of good arguments in here (though Bordero pissed me off with 90% of what he said). Since he&#8217;s been thoroughly flamed off this thread, I can safely congratulate you, and award you with one internet (collectively). I can really agree with a lot of what you guys said (especially the wrong but necessary occasionally angle, I&#8217;ve always wondered about that).<br />
well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-93866</link>
		<dc:creator>Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-93866</guid>
		<description>mAgnUS ... make my children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mAgnUS &#8230; make my children</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mAgnUS BUTTfoorson</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-93857</link>
		<dc:creator>mAgnUS BUTTfoorson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-93857</guid>
		<description>When I heard about waterboarding I thought it was some new sport.

Looks like I was right. To the extreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I heard about waterboarding I thought it was some new sport.</p>
<p>Looks like I was right. To the extreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howie Feltersnatch</title>
		<link>http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/comment-page-1/#comment-93852</link>
		<dc:creator>Howie Feltersnatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/02/23/waterboarding/#comment-93852</guid>
		<description>Foinlavin: Was that &quot;The Shield&quot;? The phonebook treatment sounds like something Andy Sipowicz would have done on NYPD Blue. Vic would be more the shove-a-flashlight-in-the-perp&#039;s-rectum guy. Heh heh.

The thing about torture is, that when people talk about these &quot;ticking timebomb&quot; scenarios where the terrorist has the code to the bomb, or knows where the dying kid is--of course you&#039;re going to do whatever it takes to get the info. If you&#039;re the cop, you&#039;re going to beat the information out of the guy, and then suffer the punishement later. The problem with our waterboarding policy in Guanatamo is that we&#039;re doing it lots of folks, without regard to immediacy. Torture, as a way to get general information, is immoral and ineffective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foinlavin: Was that &#8220;The Shield&#8221;? The phonebook treatment sounds like something Andy Sipowicz would have done on NYPD Blue. Vic would be more the shove-a-flashlight-in-the-perp&#8217;s-rectum guy. Heh heh.</p>
<p>The thing about torture is, that when people talk about these &#8220;ticking timebomb&#8221; scenarios where the terrorist has the code to the bomb, or knows where the dying kid is&#8211;of course you&#8217;re going to do whatever it takes to get the info. If you&#8217;re the cop, you&#8217;re going to beat the information out of the guy, and then suffer the punishement later. The problem with our waterboarding policy in Guanatamo is that we&#8217;re doing it lots of folks, without regard to immediacy. Torture, as a way to get general information, is immoral and ineffective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

