![]()
Related Posts
The Tiki Web Group
YieldBuild
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.







Processing your request, Please wait....
February 11, 2008 at 11:23 pm
They like conservative Ron Paul, but they can’t stand liberal Leiberman.
February 12, 2008 at 10:32 am
You heat that sound republican troll…
images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=tumbleweeds&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
February 12, 2008 at 10:37 am
Lieberman?
Liberal?
I think not.
And who’s this “they” you speak of? Everyone I know who supports Ron Paul is a RAGING conservative.
February 12, 2008 at 10:50 am
This image is some really indepth commentary. Despite the touch of humour, I find myself walking away more informed about the issues.
February 12, 2008 at 1:40 pm
I support Ron Paul… I’m financially conservative, and only a little bit liberal socially but not to the point of free hand-outs… I’m not a raging conservative.
February 12, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Free handouts has got to be the most meaningless phrase in politics. It basically means, ‘government spending that I personally do not approve of’. It’s the fiscal equivalent to calling people all people you just plain don’t like ‘fascists’.
February 12, 2008 at 6:51 pm
No, free handouts does not mean “government spending that I personally do not approve of” it means “the government taxes me (takes money I WORK FOR), and then gives that money to worthless pieces of shit on welfare because they don’t want to have a job.” (see that episode of some MTV show where Dirty Old Bastard (ODB) goes to the welfare office to try to collect) “Government spending that I personally do not approve of” is pork barrel spending like $25 million for some stupid fish in some governor’s home state that no one has cared about in ever.
February 12, 2008 at 7:09 pm
Used to refer to homeowner bailouts:
www.foreclosurefish.com/blog/index.php?print=258
Agricultural subsidies:
www.readbangkokpost.com/business/agriculture/chalongphob_on_depoliticising.php
A really stupid discussion involving expanding the civil service (or whatever you yanks call it) on Keynesian principles:
community.aarp.org/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1977&nav=messages&webtag=rp-issues&tid=44244
(some one should have said ‘The US is mine and it owes me a living, ask me why and I’ll spit in your eye’)
Raising the minimum wage, national health, marketplace interference (another vague term/complaint):
au.answers.yahoo.com/answers2/frontend.php/question?qid=20080206004750AAe9izo
National Health Care:
answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080101061932AAqAsoz
.
Those are my first few google results for ‘free government handouts’ in quotations and not one has referred to welfare. By coincidence, these are all by righties, but lefties use the same term for corporate relief and so on. I also see the term frequently applied to science grants and public education, disturbingly. And of course, the fucking Space Program, possibly the only time ‘free government hand outs’ is semi-correct, but only if followed by ‘for the biggest masturbation project in human history’.
.
So, yeah, welfare barely comes into it.
February 12, 2008 at 7:32 pm
‘Welfare’ is kind of like fnord, people just loose all reason when they see it. People who are ok with literally losing billions of dollars in Iraq go batshit when they see one guy on TV get a welfare check that he doesn’t deserve.