Ron Paul

1200444812980.jpg (75 KB)

Why is he wearing tennis shoes?

  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    33 Comment threads
    0 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    20 Comment authors
    NancyNirvanaNinemAgnUS BUTTfoorsonoldurcuCaio Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    nicklogan2
    Member

    why not?

    st_judas
    Member

    Once you get a bit older the bones in one’s extremities start feeling the age a bit more… so tennis shoes make great sense if you’re old enough for comfort to matter. Dr. Paul apparently cares about his comfort. Good for him.

    Anonymouse
    Member

    Poor crazy man sitting alone in a room… He has no friends. It’s sad, really.

    freeky_geek
    Member

    why is he wearing tennis shoes?
    Because he’s ‘running’ for president. ba da bum

    Sticky
    Member

    He seems sad. 🙁

    Howie Feltersnatch
    Member

    Because he’s completely bug-fuck insane?

    ohmybob
    Member

    He looks like a man in a nursing home, dressed in his Sunday best, waiting for the guests to arrive for his 82nd birthday party.

    No one ever comes. But that’s okay because he gets all the cake to himself.

    Kolossos
    Member

    @freeky_geek
    pish

    blisskitty
    Member

    he looks so tiny and sad…

    Caio
    Member

    Ron Paul will work tirelessly, as seen in his expression, to ensure that every America is as economically comfortable as his feet are in that picture. See that big, empty rooom? It’s empty because Ron Paul will ensure that politicians don’t waste American tax dollars on frills and luxuries.

    Ron Paul for President ’08

    AAK15
    Member

    Ron Paul would destroy this country.

    Doesnt matter though he’ll never be elected

    Caio
    Member

    I like Ron Paul because I can distinguish his beliefs from the other candidates slightly, which makes him only 99% politician, though I still don’t care who wins. Hilary Clinton, a while ago, had an internet vote for what would be her official campaign song, and one of the options was “Get Ready” by the Temptations. I find that hilarious, because that song is so obviously about sex without actuall saying ‘let’s fuck’. Hilary is gonna try to make love to the American People. Ahem. I personally think she should have gove with ‘Sex Machine Pt. 2’ by James Brown.… Read more »

    Caio
    Member

    Where’s that confounded bridge?!

    caradoc
    Member
    caradoc

    Because he is running for President.

    natedog
    Member

    if you look at the Meetup.com info, Ron Paul has ’em all beat to shit. he has 100,000 members in 1500 groups in 31 countries with 28,000 events held so far. ronpaul.meetup.com/about/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ the next closest is Huckabee with 14,000 members in 475 groups in 1 country with 1600 events. mikehuckabee.meetup.com/about/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Obama has 4000 members in 76 groups in 5 countries with 800 events. barackobama.meetup.com/about/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hillary has 1400 members in 50 groups in 3 countries with 250 events. hrclinton.meetup.com/about/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mitt Romney has 83 members in 10 groups in 1 country with 5 events. mittromney.meetup.com/about/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ McCain has… Read more »

    natedog
    Member

    why is it that only if Ron Paul is not breaking Donation records, every word printed about him is bastardly?

    it’s not like he is trying to hurt america. he is trying to get it back to what the Founders envisioned when they fought to create it.

    natedog
    Member

    he’ll get shot if he gets elected anyway.

    dekay46
    Member

    correction: he is trying to get it back to what he believes the Founders envisioned when they fought to create it.

    Caio
    Member

    You know, I don’t know what you motherfuckers learned in school, but as far as I know, all the founders cared about was: 1) No Kings/Nobility. Done and done. 2) “Millions for defense, not a penny for tribute”. Which they never did anyway. Does anyone do the tribute thing anymore nowadays? 3) Fuck the Royal Proclamation. I wanna kill as much injuns as I like!! Done and done. They didn’t invent Democracy, and they only cared about it so long as it allowed them to kill injuns. When they said ‘All Men are Created Equal” they meant ‘fuck any King… Read more »

    natedog
    Member

    Caio, you’re retarded. the Constitution had nothing to do with democracy. in a democracy, the 51% control the 49%. it’s called tyranny of the majority. The United States was formed as a Democratic Republic, which is a representative form of government with certain rights that are guaranteed to the citizens. also, the Constitution is a shield to protect a person against their government. the Founders wanted a localized government that put the power in the hands of the states and local governments. what we have now is a bullshit highly centralized oppressive government. it’s not about killing indians, of which… Read more »

    vygramul
    Member

    Ron Paul is right on most things. Just not the economy, race-relations, foreign relations, the military, and military intelligence. That’s not as harsh as it sounds, since most people get those wrong anyway.

    natedog
    Member

    how utterly retarded post 21 is.

    fuck. i give up.

    Caio
    Member

    “in a democracy, the 51% control the 49%. it’s called tyranny of the majority.” … Nice Jefferson quote, but virtually every democracy has long sense switched to proportional representation, where larger electoral districts with multiple seats are formed, and seats in the legislature are devided based on approximate percentages of voters. It is more ideal under a parlimentary system, but it’s nearly ideal because it spreads the power over many parties, who are more able to to create subtle platforms more taylored to a wide variety of political beliefs. … So, ‘tyrany by the majority’ really isn’t necissary, since methods… Read more »

    öldürcü
    Member

    in your fifty pages on the forefathers, will you spell words like “dIvided” and “necEssary” and “parliAmentary” correctly?

    also, will you make sense in it? i mean, what exactly are you trying to say?

    Caio
    Member

    Terribly sorry, Oldcru. English isn’t my first language, so my first instinct is to spell ‘parliamentary’ as I would in my native tongue. I also capitalize the first letter in every sentence as is the custom in my native land.

    schulzbrianr
    Member

    Oldcru, you also missed “tailored” “since” and the second “tyranny” so, no one’s perfect.

    öldürcü
    Member

    frequently the way a word is said and the exact spelling don’t relate, but feel free to avoid criticism with sarcasm. also, when has perfect grammar mattered on the internet? having said that it could be argued that spelling doesn’t matter either, but that’s only when one is trying to shorten a word. spelling “divide” like “devide” is just plain stupidity. schulzbrianr, i hope you’re not equating missing another person’s errors with the actual errors. in fact, with that post, you’ve only proven my point. and caio, you responded to one criticism, but how about how your post doesn’t really… Read more »

    schulzbrianr
    Member

    “i hope you’re not equating missing another person’s errors with the actual errors”

    Well, if you’re going to spellcheck something for someone, the least you could do is be thorough about it.

    Caio
    Member

    My point was this:

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_Representation

    Nate had thrown some bland cliché from Jefferson at me, and I pointed out that most democracies had worked their way around the problem.

    I was born in Brazil, and I’ve lived in Portugal, which is a good example of a PR system. Quite beautiful in action, really. Don’t know why the English countries didn’t adapt it long ago, save indolence and corruption.

    öldürcü
    Member

    well i don’t know for how long Britain’s had that kind of proportional representation, but if they didn’t adapt it “long ago” it’s because things take time to develop.

    the US couldn’t be that, because it can only work in smallish states like those of Europe. when a state has over 300 million people in it every group couldn’t possibly be represented. it’s the same reason we in the US don’t have pure democracy, it just wouldn’t work. we have a republic, which seems to work just fine for such a large country.

    TrAyVon'S GhOSt, nuCca
    Member

    Last I checked Caio is Canadian? What language is your first then? French? Here’s a tip for all that will help you look like smarty pants: download firefox and get the fucking spell check plugin. . Now will someone please tell me why I’m seeing hate groups on facebook devoted to this guy calling him a racist and saying he advocates killing black people or something? . And explain to me why you assholes still vote at all? Last I checked the democratic process is a guise to distract the masses with the illusion of free will. When was the… Read more »

    NirvanaNine
    Member

    @magnus
    i’ll do something like that
    ‘cept mine will be 3 times as good

    it shall be called

    is this sparta?

    Nancy
    Guest
    Nancy

    Oh my gosh, his feet hurt because he’s been standing a lot… He’s just a practical old guy and it shows! VOTE FOR RON PAUL!



    Advertisements Alcohol Animated Images Architecture Art Awesome Things Batman Cars Comic Books Computers Cosplay Cute As Hell Animals Dark Humor Donald Trump Fantasy - Science Fiction Fashion Food Forum Fodder Gaming Humor Interesting LOLcats Military Movie Posters Movies Music Nature NeSFW Politics Religion Sad :( Science! Sexy Space Sports Star Trek Star Wars Technology Television Vertical Wallpaper Wallpaper Weapons Women WTF X-Mas