AxE 1337

Posted on January 16, 2008 by diabeetus |
Filed Under Uncategorized and has these tags: ,
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (11 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...






Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge.



13 Responses to “AxE 1337”

  1. Avias on January 16th, 2008 9:43 am

    I understand.. and I do have a hot girlfriend. Not all programming geeks are losers. lol

  2. windrider on January 16th, 2008 9:48 am

    You don’t have to know programming to understand that! It’s just plain English with punctuation thrown in.

  3. LukeV1-5 on January 16th, 2008 10:25 am

    Avias: Why do you continue to delude yourself? You are not going out with your mother, she just owns the basement you live in.

  4. Ando on January 16th, 2008 10:26 am

    Axe smells makes you smell like a hookers handbag.

  5. chiefbutz on January 16th, 2008 11:41 am

    I am allergic to Axe. And I got a girlfriend, so I am in the clear. And yes, I understand it, my girlfriend could understand it… (she is a creative writing major and does NOTHING with computers but type and play a few games)

  6. Kaze on January 16th, 2008 12:02 pm

    That’s incomplete!

    var you = girl
    var understand.this = yes
    var get.a.girlfriend

    if (you == understand.this){
    get.a.girlfriend = awesome;
    }
    else
    understand.this = no;
    (you == understand.this){
    get.a.girlfriend = no;
    }
    else
    (you == understand.this){
    get.a.girlfriend = yes;
    }

    cout >> get.a.girlfriend;
    void main(o);

  7. goforbroke on January 16th, 2008 12:30 pm

    i still dont get it Kaze, can you dumb it down for me a little bit more?

  8. reboot on January 16th, 2008 1:43 pm

    “this” is a pointer. the way that axe ad uses it is weird, but might work depending on how the object was defined. Kaze’s implementation would definitely not work.
    Feel free to correct me, I haven’t used C++ since undergrad.

  9. LukeV1-5 on January 16th, 2008 1:53 pm

    You people……you make me laugh. You bring light to my day. Because I always know there’s someone out there who has even less of a life than I do.

  10. samoses on January 17th, 2008 2:03 am

    kaze’s post looks like c++, but some of the syntax is wrong, and the structure of the code makes it hard to read. not good programming standards :P

  11. windrider on January 17th, 2008 7:32 am

    It’s called pseudocode and it’s acceptable if you just want to explain things and not compile it.

  12. Phyreblade on January 17th, 2008 10:43 am

    Naw, this isn’t pseudo code, Pseudocode generally uses plain English analogs to describe the language specific functionality.

    Hmm, this is bad. I actually had to stop myself from pointing out all the syntax , possible runtime and logic errors in the code… ROFL…

    Sadly, I don’t have a girlfriend either, so I’m finding this whole post is kind of disturbing at a personal level… :(

  13. Kaze on January 18th, 2008 10:42 am

    *laughs* no the code wouldn’t run at all.

    I was trying to make a good joke about it, then got side tracked and came back to it, lost my place, then shrugged and just started typing.

    You know, what programmers do.

    And for what its worth, I did use spacing to make it readable, but MCS shot it down =/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.