Sideboobs are NSFW, duh :
![]()
Pause for a moment for a sponsor!
The Tiki Web Group
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.




(9 votes, average: 4.44 out of 5)

December 4, 2007 at 7:49 am
OM NOM NOM NOM.
If you think otherwise – you’re either gay, or dead.
December 4, 2007 at 9:39 am
i agree 100%!!!!
December 4, 2007 at 11:01 am
I don’t know what classifies as perfect breasts but her’s have got to be as nearly perfect as perfect can be!
December 4, 2007 at 12:41 pm
Mhhhm, sideboob.
December 4, 2007 at 1:25 pm
Must be an older picture. No back tattoos. That being said…Om Nom Nom Nom Nom!
December 4, 2007 at 2:49 pm
I can’t get Peter Griffin’s voice out of my head now.
December 4, 2007 at 7:22 pm
This is really what God was going for when He created the earth. Everything else was an experiment…
If this isn’t a solid argument for creation, nothing else is… Can any one of you honestly say this particular permutation of genes occured by accident!?
ROFL
December 6, 2007 at 9:00 am
“If this isn’t a solid argument for creation, nothing else is… Can any one of you honestly say this particular permutation of genes occured by accident!?”
Sigh, one more time… There is nothing accidental about natural selection (although there may be some weight to the argument that random mutation is also a helping factor in some cases).
If anything, this is proof of Evolution by natural selection. The pretty ones are more likely to breed and pass on the genes that make them pretty.
December 6, 2007 at 9:00 am
Oh, and…
OM NOM NOM NOM
December 6, 2007 at 6:12 pm
@RichardAtHome
OK, my post was actually made in jest, but since you bring it up, let me ask you a question. Why is it that the pretty girls are the vast minority of the population? Sounds like an Epic Phail on the part of natural selection…
December 17, 2007 at 3:38 pm
“Why is it that the pretty girls are the vast minority of the population?”
I suggest you move – no problems here
December 17, 2007 at 3:40 pm
… and to answer your question…
Probably because all the Ugly Guys are usually rich
December 17, 2007 at 9:51 pm
LOL OK then…
January 14, 2008 at 12:13 pm
her lips are way better than her boobs.
i mean, which would you rather put your pee pee between?
and as for my 2 cents, Ms. Jolie-Pitt evidences Creation more than Evolution
January 14, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Parts of her are store bought so creationism loses.
January 14, 2008 at 12:37 pm
so evolution went into the store and bought the spare parts to put in her?
nope. there was a MIND behind those actions, not a mindless process.