Your Ad Here

Missing Link

, ,
10 votes, average: 3.60 out of 510 votes, average: 3.60 out of 510 votes, average: 3.60 out of 510 votes, average: 3.60 out of 510 votes, average: 3.60 out of 5 (10 votes, average: 3.60 out of 5) (Log in to vote!)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted on October 20, 2007 by tiki god | FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites

edaa75997e6067cf25f083b1f2c9abf1 Missing Link

Processing your request, Please wait....
  • submit to reddit
Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
This entry was posted in Images and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
lolkittens!

Ology

9 Responses to Missing Link

  3. halfmad (UID# 752) Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    October 20, 2007 at 8:23 pm

    Isn’t that a missing image error and not a missing link?

    Evolution > *.religion.

    Reply
  5. wtfburgerz (UID# 381) Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    October 20, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    Hmm WTF my equation didn’t show.
    Evolution >= religion
    Religion > …,

    Reply
  7. mikki (UID# 1072) Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    October 21, 2007 at 4:35 am

    Isn’t this a repost? And yes, it would be funnier if that was a 404 instead.

    Reply
  8. phyreblade-2 (UID# 1414) Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    October 29, 2007 at 4:25 am

    Lol, yeah this would be much better with a 404 error. And BTW that article still does nothing to address the 404 error illustrated above.

    Species A being related to species b species b came from species a. It’s all hypothetical. Not that the Intelligent Design camp is particularly concrete either…

    Reply
  9. phyreblade-2 (UID# 1414) Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    October 29, 2007 at 4:28 am

    That didn’t come out right. Durn html…

    A lot of sensationalism going on in that article. It does not “solve” evolution. It merely makes it more plausible.

    The fact that “A” is found to be closely linked, or related to “B” does not mean that “B” is a descendant of “A”…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>