nsfw archer :
nsfw – Archery never looked so good….
(19 votes, average: 3.84 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...
Add to favorites Tags: wtf
Processing your request, Please wait....
Leave a comment ?
(19 votes, average: 3.84 out of 5)You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ...Add to favorites Tags: wtf
October 17, 2007 at 9:26 pm
Gosh – you can almost see her quiver…
October 17, 2007 at 9:56 pm
I thought amazons burnt of a breast to be better archers. How’s she doin’ it?
October 17, 2007 at 10:19 pm
That is a fallacy perpetuated by ignorance.
October 17, 2007 at 10:25 pm
Why use a bow and arrow when she’s got a perfectly good pair of bazookas?
October 17, 2007 at 11:13 pm
they do paul, your just drunk… the other boob gets in the way of the string
October 17, 2007 at 11:43 pm
a- (privative) + mazos, “without breast”
Brigantyna,
No it’s not. Considering there’s only sporadic documentation on them at best it’s as valid as any other theory on them. Except Xena. Xena probably wasn’t a very accurate portrayal.
October 18, 2007 at 9:44 am
Is that a taser in her back pocket?
October 18, 2007 at 6:03 pm
the target looks like its smiling. I wonder why?
October 18, 2007 at 9:10 pm
So (mAgnUS)….considering there’s only “sporadic documentation”, how exactly can you say, definitively, “no it’s not” a fallacy? Mightn’t you say “not necessarily”? Although I do accept that it’s as good a theory as any other. I find it difficult to believe, though, that an entire race would maim their younglings just to be “more adept” with a bow. As you can see from the photo, her (ginormous) breasts do not interfere in the least. And, being relatively well-endowed myself and having done some archery, I can tell you I’ve never even grazed a sideboob. It just doesn’t make sense.
October 18, 2007 at 9:12 pm
Taking aim at the stalker hiding out in her bushes…
October 18, 2007 at 10:12 pm
Brig, I think the issue might be less what the Amazons did or did not do, but rather weather or not they existed. The Greeks thought they lived in Anatolia till they went to Anatolia, and then they just said they lived in random places (Ukrania, Lybia, various islands). Archaeologists have never found any evidence of their existence and all the places they supposedly were had well-documented patriarchal cultures. It was just a story, really.
Which just asks another question: Wtf did Heracles and Achilles fite?!?
October 19, 2007 at 2:29 pm
Caio – maybe they found a small village each of single-titted women who favoured archery? -=shrug=-