Honestly, whatever.

I’m not cursing.
I’m not getting emotional.
I’m not trying to change your point of view (though you may argue otherwise).
I’m not trying to convince myself of what I believe by vigorously defending my point of view.

I’m using logic to point out the flaws in your argument, which being a subject based on faith, has very little logic about it. So get all riled up if you want, I don’t care. I’m not going to change your mind, you certainly won’t change mine.

Though if you want to actually argue on something like this, you should understand logic and perhaps empirical evidence, which is the foundation of all sound arguments. Arguments, as in the subject of discourse on opposing points of view, such as what happens in the court of law, not what people do in bars before they get in fights.

I’m through with this pointless internet argument. Now feel free to attack my grammar or whatever else you can do to make yourself feel like you have “won.” I’m out.

Therefore, we are both atheists, and I simply choose to believe in one less deity.

reboot, I never said that I was a Christian. So go fuck yourself.

The Akhenatin theory represents the problem you’d find in the bulk of comparative religion: Westerners – Christian and Atheist – reunderstand other religions via Christianity and distort them heavily. For a First Nations History class I’ve been taking, I’ve been hanging out in the local reservation archives a lot. Interestingly enough, that religion was seen as having monotheistic characteristics by a lot of white folks. Indeed, it has one God, in that it has an immortal universe-creator. But that “god” has no personal aspect to it, it’s a place. Land which created land, in effect. The land was a living, nurturing thing to these people, so it made sense. It didn’t talk or give commandments. It’s actually pretty marginal. Animals, for them, have always existed, and the human-creator, and the ethical teachers were very ungodlike: Typically animals, and always mortal and mainly dead. And that’s just the start of it. Trying to understand that worldview in Western, Christian terms like ‘God’ and ‘Monotheist’ is confusing and distorting.

As for the historical veracity of the Bible, remember that most historical documents before 1600 were just about equally as religious. Keep that in mind any time you hear any historical fact or theory.

But still Christian Science? I got an idea since modern science prove their theory through demonstration, why dont Christian research on their science to prove that the theory of things mention in the bible is true.